Deanna Dadusc

402 citations
17 papers · 198 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Deanna Dadusc

13 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Deanna Dadusc
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Urban Studies 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 146
  • Finance 33
  • Clinical Psychology 52
  • General Health Professions 44
Replace Ulrike Hamann with:
Ulrike Hamann Germany
René Kreichauf Belgium
Elena Fontanari Italy
Thomas Swerts Netherlands
Didem Danış Türkiye
Nicolas Fischer France
Margit Fauser Germany
Myer Siemiatycki Canada
Giuseppe Campesi Italy
Esther Hitchen United Kingdom
Deanna Dadusc relative to Ulrike Hamann Germany Ulrike Hamann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ulrike Hamann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deanna Dadusc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deanna Dadusc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deanna Dadusc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deanna Dadusc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deanna Dadusc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deanna Dadusc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deanna Dadusc. The network helps show where Deanna Dadusc may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Deanna Dadusc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deanna Dadusc Line = papers co-authored together Deanna Dadusc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202069
2 201945
3 202128
4 201918
5 20199
6 20218
7 20137
8
Kraken in Amsterdam anno 2009
20095
9 20102
10 20232
11
Kerend tij; Criminalisering van de kraakbeweging
20121
12 20141
13
Silencing the Streets: From Covid Exceptions to Police Crackdowns
20211
14
Kraken in Amsterdam anno 2009 - Squatting in Amsterdam year 2009
20091
15
The criminalisation of squatting: Discourses, moral panics and resistances in the Netherlands, England and Wales
20151
16
Rituelen in krakersverzet - Rituals of resistance in the squatting movement.
20140
17
Power, knowledge and resistance in the study of social movements.
20140

About Deanna Dadusc

Deanna Dadusc is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology and Finance, having authored 17 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (6 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers), Global Security and Public Health (2 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (33 citations), Sociology and Political Science (146 citations), Finance (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (52 citations) and General Health Professions (44 citations). Deanna Dadusc has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pierpaolo Mudu, Miguel A. Martínez, Maurice Stierl, F.H.M. van Gemert, Vu, Dina Siegel, Raphael Schlembach, Joanna Gilmore and Chris Rossdale. Their work appears in journals such as Citizenship Studies, City, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies and Geopolitics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact