Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Visual product evaluation: exploring users’ emotional relationships with products
2002136 citationsDeana McDonagh, Anne Bruseberg et al.Applied Ergonomicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Deana McDonagh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Deana McDonagh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deana McDonagh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deana McDonagh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deana McDonagh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deana McDonagh. The network helps show where Deana McDonagh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deana McDonagh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deana McDonagh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deana McDonagh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Deana McDonagh. Deana McDonagh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Woodcock, Andrée, et al.. (2018). Permeating the barriers between the individual and policy designers in Pakistan: A cross-cultural study of women’s mobility.1 indexed citations
Malins, Julian & Deana McDonagh. (2008). A Grand Day Out: Empathic Approaches to Design. Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University). 198–203.2 indexed citations
McDonagh, Deana & Howard G. Denton. (2000). User-centred design and the focus group: developing the student designer's empathic horizons.. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).5 indexed citations
20.
McDonagh, Deana. (1999). User evaluation techniques applied to small domestic appliances: A pilot study. 1525–1546.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.