Dean Acheson
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- History top 10%
- Development top 10%
- Topics
- Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers)Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers)Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Dean Acheson
20 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Political Science and International Relations 189
- Sociology and Political Science 161
- Economics and Econometrics 39
- History 25
- Development 21
Countries citing papers authored by Dean Acheson
This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Acheson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Acheson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Acheson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Acheson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Acheson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Acheson. The network helps show where Dean Acheson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean Acheson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean Acheson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean Acheson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean Acheson. Dean Acheson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Affection and Trust: The Personal Correspondence of Harry S. Truman and Dean Acheson, 1953-1971 | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Sir William Power Memorial Lecture. "Are obstetrics & midwifery doomed"? | 4 |
| 5 | Among friends: Personal letters of Dean Acheson | 3 |
| 6 | Official conversations and meetings of Dean Acheson (1949-1953) | 0 |
| 7 | Reviews of the world situation, 1949-1950 : hearings held in executive session before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-first Congress, first and second sessions, on the world situation | 1 |
| 8 | 158 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Morning and Noon | 5 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | A citizen looks at Congress | 1 |
| 20 | 8 |
About Dean Acheson
Dean Acheson is a scholar working on Law, Cultural Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (189 citations), Development (21 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (161 citations). Frequent co-authors include Donald R. McCoy, Charles E. Neu, Donald N. Koster, Selig Adler, David McLellan and Harry S. Truman. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Harvard Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.