D.C. van den Boom
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Education top 2%
- Demography top 1%
- Co-authors
- Frank van BalenHenny BosMirjana MajdandžićEddy H. de BruynPaul LesemanJan B. HoeksmaWillem KoopsTheo Sandfort
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
D.C. van den Boom
27 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
- Social Psychology 964
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 383
- Education 367
- Demography 321
Countries citing papers authored by D.C. van den Boom
This map shows the geographic impact of D.C. van den Boom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.C. van den Boom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.C. van den Boom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.C. van den Boom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.C. van den Boom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.C. van den Boom. The network helps show where D.C. van den Boom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.C. van den Boom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.C. van den Boom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.C. van den Boom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.C. van den Boom. D.C. van den Boom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 133 | |
| 4 | 73 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 81 | |
| 8 | 97 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | Modeling the sensitivity - attachment hypothesis | 0 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 99 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 303 | |
| 20 | 480 |
About D.C. van den Boom
D.C. van den Boom is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Reproductive Medicine and Demography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Pharmacy (255 citations) and Social Psychology (964 citations). D.C. van den Boom has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Frank van Balen, Henny Bos, Mirjana Majdandžić, Eddy H. de Bruyn, Paul Leseman, Jan B. Hoeksma, Willem Koops, Theo Sandfort, Han L. J. van der Maas and Wieke de Vente. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.