D.C. van den Boom
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 9
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Infant Health and Development 4
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 4
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 4
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 5
- Demography top 1%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 6
-
- Early Childhood Education and Development 6
-
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues 2
- Co-authors
- Frank van BalenHenny BosMirjana MajdandžićEddy H. de BruynPaul LesemanJan B. HoeksmaWillem KoopsTheo Sandfort
- Journals
- Child Development (6 papers)Developmental Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
D.C. van den Boom
27 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
- Pharmacy 255
- Social Psychology 964
- Reproductive Medicine 282
- Demography 321
Countries citing papers authored by D.C. van den Boom
This map shows the geographic impact of D.C. van den Boom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.C. van den Boom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.C. van den Boom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.C. van den Boom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.C. van den Boom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.C. van den Boom. The network helps show where D.C. van den Boom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside D.C. van den Boom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 133 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 95 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 81 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 97 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 53 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 60 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 70 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 14 | Modeling the sensitivity - attachment hypothesis | 1996 | 0 |
| 15 | 1995 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 99 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 303 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 480 |
About D.C. van den Boom
D.C. van den Boom is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Reproductive Medicine and Demography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Infant Health and Development (4 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Pharmacy (255 citations) and Social Psychology (964 citations). D.C. van den Boom has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Frank van Balen, Henny Bos, Mirjana Majdandžić, Eddy H. de Bruyn, Paul Leseman, Jan B. Hoeksma, Willem Koops, Theo Sandfort, Han L. J. van der Maas and Wieke de Vente. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.