David-Lee Priest
Impact in
- Music top 0.5%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Music Therapy and Health
Papers in
-
- Music Therapy and Health 10
- Music 10
- Diverse Music Education Insights 10
- Co-authors
- Costas I. Karageorghis (13 shared papers)Daniel T. Bishop (3 shared papers)Andrew M. Lane (1 shared paper)Peter C. Terry (1 shared paper)Leighton Jones (2 shared papers)Adam R. Clarke (2 shared papers)Jonathan M. Bird (1 shared paper)Alan Nevill (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (2 papers)Psychology of sport and exercise (2 papers)International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Sports Sciences (1 paper)European Physical Education Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
David-Lee Priest
13 papers receiving 952 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Music 255
- Social Psychology 576
- Cognitive Neuroscience 492
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 212
- Applied Psychology 76
Countries citing papers authored by David-Lee Priest
This map shows the geographic impact of David-Lee Priest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David-Lee Priest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David-Lee Priest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David-Lee Priest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David-Lee Priest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David-Lee Priest. The network helps show where David-Lee Priest may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside David-Lee Priest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 336 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 167 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 148 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 64 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 64 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 55 | |
| 8 | Music in Sport and Exercise: An Update on Research and Application | 2008 | 39 |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 3 |
About David-Lee Priest
David-Lee Priest is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Music, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Music Education Insights (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (10 papers), Music Therapy and Health (10 papers), Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Sports injuries and prevention (1 paper) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (255 citations), Social Psychology (576 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (492 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (212 citations) and Applied Psychology (76 citations). David-Lee Priest has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Costas I. Karageorghis, Daniel T. Bishop, Andrew M. Lane, Peter C. Terry, Leighton Jones, Adam R. Clarke, Jonathan M. Bird, Alan Nevill, Marcelo Bigliassi and C. Psychol. Their work appears in journals such as Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Psychology of sport and exercise, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Journal of Sports Sciences and European Physical Education Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.