David Wilby
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 9
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 4
- Plant and animal studies 3
- Co-authors
- Nicholas W. Roberts (7 shared papers)Almut Kelber (4 shared papers)Peter Olsson (3 shared papers)James J. Foster (2 shared papers)Shelby E. Temple (2 shared papers)Martin J. How (2 shared papers)Camilla R. Sharkey (1 shared paper)M. Carter Cornwall (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Vision Research (2 papers)Journal of Experimental Biology (2 papers)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Wilby
15 papers receiving 266 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 100
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 99
- Biochemistry 23
- Sensory Systems 17
- Biophysics 11
Countries citing papers authored by David Wilby
This map shows the geographic impact of David Wilby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wilby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wilby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Wilby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wilby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wilby. The network helps show where David Wilby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Wilby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 |
About David Wilby
David Wilby is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (2 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (100 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (99 citations), Biochemistry (23 citations), Sensory Systems (17 citations) and Biophysics (11 citations). David Wilby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas W. Roberts, Almut Kelber, Peter Olsson, James J. Foster, Shelby E. Temple, Martin J. How, Camilla R. Sharkey, M. Carter Cornwall, Kathryn D. Feller and Joseph C. Corbo. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of Experimental Biology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Scientific Reports and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.