Emily Baird

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
92 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Emily Baird is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Baird has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 48 papers in Genetics and 39 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Emily Baird's work include Plant and animal studies (55 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (48 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (39 papers). Emily Baird is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (55 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (48 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (39 papers). Emily Baird collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and South Africa. Emily Baird's co-authors include Marie Dacke, Marcus J. Byrne, Eric J. Warrant, Basil el Jundi, Jochen Smolka, Mandyam V. Srinivasan, Norbert Boeddeker, Clarke H. Scholtz, Gavin J. Taylor and Lana Khaldy and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Emily Baird

90 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Baird Sweden 29 1.3k 1.1k 901 353 311 92 2.4k
Marie Dacke Sweden 35 1.6k 1.2× 1.7k 1.6× 1.2k 1.3× 357 1.0× 359 1.2× 83 3.5k
Daniel Robert United Kingdom 39 2.6k 2.1× 1.2k 1.1× 1.5k 1.6× 589 1.7× 303 1.0× 155 4.8k
Thomas Labhart Switzerland 33 1.2k 1.0× 2.1k 2.0× 1.1k 1.2× 205 0.6× 197 0.6× 46 3.1k
Dan‐Eric Nilsson Sweden 41 1.4k 1.1× 1.7k 1.6× 864 1.0× 183 0.5× 734 2.4× 133 5.4k
Aravinthan D. T. Samuel United States 49 539 0.4× 2.6k 2.5× 868 1.0× 432 1.2× 612 2.0× 94 6.5k
S. N. Patek United States 37 1.0k 0.8× 268 0.3× 561 0.6× 126 0.4× 1.1k 3.5× 77 4.1k
Donald M. Wilson United States 23 690 0.5× 989 0.9× 589 0.7× 99 0.3× 321 1.0× 53 2.5k
Robert D. Reed United States 36 2.0k 1.6× 829 0.8× 2.2k 2.4× 409 1.2× 203 0.7× 90 3.6k
Ronald R. Hoy United States 45 4.0k 3.1× 1.7k 1.6× 1.9k 2.1× 613 1.7× 499 1.6× 118 5.9k
Thomas L. Daniel United States 34 675 0.5× 533 0.5× 390 0.4× 184 0.5× 631 2.0× 64 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Baird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Baird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Baird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Baird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Baird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Baird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Baird. The network helps show where Emily Baird may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Baird

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Baird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Baird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Baird. Emily Baird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Caplat, Paul, et al.. (2025). Warm or bright – Temperature and light microhabitat use in insect pollinators. Ecological Entomology. 50(5). 853–864.
2.
Gérard, Maxence, et al.. (2024). Experimental elevated temperature affects bumblebee foraging and flight speed. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 291(2033). 4 indexed citations
3.
Kendall, Liam, Peter Olsson, Gavin J. Taylor, et al.. (2024). The Interplay Between Visual Traits and Forest in Bumblebee Communities Across Sweden. Ecology and Evolution. 14(12). e70635–e70635. 1 indexed citations
4.
Belušič, Gregor, et al.. (2024). Polarized light detection in bumblebees varies with light intensity and is mediated by both the ocelli and compound eyes. Biology Letters. 20(9). 20240299–20240299. 4 indexed citations
5.
Baird, Emily, Marie Dacke, Alexander Kovalev, et al.. (2023). The effect of surface topography on the ball-rolling ability of Kheper lamarcki (Scarabaeidae). Journal of Experimental Biology. 227(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Gérard, Maxence, et al.. (2023). Elevated developmental temperatures impact the size and allometry of morphological traits of the bumblebeeBombus terrestris. Journal of Experimental Biology. 226(8). 13 indexed citations
7.
Baird, Emily, et al.. (2023). Visual guidance of honeybees approaching a vertical landing surface. Journal of Experimental Biology. 226(17). 7 indexed citations
8.
Miettinen, Arttu, et al.. (2023). Novel Methodology for Localizing and Studying Insect Dorsal Rim Area Morphology in 2D and 3D. Insects. 14(8). 670–670. 1 indexed citations
9.
Wiklund, Christer, et al.. (2021). Sensory Organ Investment Varies with Body Size and Sex in the Butterfly Pieris napi. Insects. 12(12). 1064–1064. 2 indexed citations
10.
Baird, Emily, et al.. (2021). Higher developmental temperature increases queen production and decreases worker body size in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 88. 39–49. 23 indexed citations
11.
Baird, Emily. (2020). Obstacle avoidance in bumblebees is robust to changes in light intensity. Animal Cognition. 23(6). 1081–1086. 3 indexed citations
12.
Khaldy, Lana, Claudia Tocco, Marcus J. Byrne, Emily Baird, & Marie Dacke. (2019). Straight-line orientation in the woodland-living beetle Sisyphus fasciculatus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 206(3). 327–335. 12 indexed citations
13.
14.
Kelber, Almut, et al.. (2017). High contrast sensitivity for visually guided flight control in bumblebees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 203(12). 999–1006. 14 indexed citations
15.
Baird, Emily & Gavin J. Taylor. (2017). X-ray micro computed-tomography. Current Biology. 27(8). R289–R291. 35 indexed citations
16.
Baird, Emily & Marie Dacke. (2016). Finding the gap: a brightness-based strategy for guidance in cluttered environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 283(1828). 20152988–20152988. 21 indexed citations
17.
Jundi, Basil el, Eric J. Warrant, Marcus J. Byrne, et al.. (2015). Neural coding underlying the cue preference for celestial orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(36). 11395–11400. 132 indexed citations
18.
Dacke, Marie, Emily Baird, Marcus J. Byrne, Clarke H. Scholtz, & Eric J. Warrant. (2013). Dung Beetles Use the Milky Way for Orientation. Current Biology. 23(4). 298–300. 141 indexed citations
19.
Johansson, Lars, et al.. (2012). Elytra boost lift, but reduce aerodynamic efficiency in flying beetles. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 9(75). 2745–2748. 54 indexed citations
20.
Towers, W., et al.. (2000). Forest planning in the Cairngorms - a strategic approach.. 54(3). 153–160. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026