David W. Byrd

521 total citations
9 papers, 464 citations indexed

About

David W. Byrd is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David W. Byrd has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 464 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in David W. Byrd's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers). David W. Byrd is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers). David W. Byrd collaborates with scholars based in United States. David W. Byrd's co-authors include H. Ferris, C. J. Nusbaum, K. R. Barker, D. Carl Freeman, E. Durant McArthur, John H. Graham, William Turner, Han Wang, D. Carl Freeman and Jeffrey L. Howard and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, American Journal of Botany and International Journal of Plant Sciences.

In The Last Decade

David W. Byrd

9 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David W. Byrd United States 7 403 61 57 49 49 9 464
Barbara van Dam United Kingdom 3 277 0.7× 45 0.7× 30 0.5× 59 1.2× 61 1.2× 3 385
Conor Meade Ireland 9 171 0.4× 49 0.8× 36 0.6× 47 1.0× 83 1.7× 26 318
Tobias M. Sandner Germany 11 197 0.5× 10 0.2× 30 0.5× 119 2.4× 158 3.2× 20 334
Katarzyna Marcysiak Poland 14 293 0.7× 34 0.6× 99 1.7× 99 2.0× 178 3.6× 42 423
Marc Kleinhentz France 9 252 0.6× 48 0.8× 46 0.8× 30 0.6× 44 0.9× 14 362
Juvenil Enrique Cares Brazil 12 347 0.9× 30 0.5× 68 1.2× 12 0.2× 40 0.8× 57 396
Sulbha Choudhari United States 7 343 0.9× 67 1.1× 46 0.8× 26 0.5× 35 0.7× 13 436
K. Browicz Poland 8 250 0.6× 18 0.3× 44 0.8× 48 1.0× 162 3.3× 28 377
Raquel Díaz Spain 10 200 0.5× 37 0.6× 52 0.9× 51 1.0× 40 0.8× 42 263
M. Webb United Kingdom 7 236 0.6× 234 3.8× 48 0.8× 54 1.1× 91 1.9× 9 378

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Byrd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Byrd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Byrd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Byrd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Byrd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Byrd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Byrd. The network helps show where David W. Byrd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David W. Byrd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David W. Byrd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David W. Byrd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David W. Byrd. David W. Byrd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Byrd, David W., Craig K. Abbey, Jhimli Mitra, et al.. (2023). Deep Learning Model Observers Trained with Human Observer Data from Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) Trials. 1–1. 2 indexed citations
2.
Byrd, David W., E. Durant McArthur, Han Wang, John H. Graham, & D. Carl Freeman. (1999). Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). VIII. Spatial and temporal pattern of terpenes. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 27(1). 11–25. 19 indexed citations
3.
Wang, Han, David W. Byrd, Jeffrey L. Howard, et al.. (1998). Narrow Hybrid Zone between Two Subspecies of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). V. Soil Properties. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 159(1). 139–147. 15 indexed citations
4.
Freeman, D. Carl, John H. Graham, David W. Byrd, E. Durant McArthur, & William Turner. (1995). Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). III. Developmental instability. American Journal of Botany. 82(9). 1144–1152. 47 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, D. Carl, John H. Graham, David W. Byrd, E. Durant McArthur, & William Turner. (1995). Narrow Hybrid Zone Between Two Subspecies of Big Sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). III. Developmental Instability. American Journal of Botany. 82(9). 1144–1144. 16 indexed citations
6.
Byrd, David W. & D. Carl Freeman. (1994). Automated static headspace sampler for gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 686(2). 235–243. 6 indexed citations
7.
Freeman, D. Carl & David W. Byrd. (1994). Statistical treatment of large digital Chromatographic data sets. Journal of Chromatography A. 686(2). 225–233. 2 indexed citations
8.
Byrd, David W., et al.. (1976). Two semi-automatic elutriators for extracting nematodes and certain fungi from soil.. PubMed. 8(3). 206–12. 305 indexed citations
9.
Byrd, David W., H. Ferris, & C. J. Nusbaum. (1972). A Method for Estimating Numbers of Eggs of Meloidogyne spp. in Soil.. PubMed. 4(4). 266–9. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026