John H. Graham

4.7k total citations
95 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

John H. Graham is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John H. Graham has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Geometry and Topology, 24 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 20 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in John H. Graham's work include Morphological variations and asymmetry (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (13 papers). John H. Graham is often cited by papers focused on Morphological variations and asymmetry (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (13 papers). John H. Graham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Netherlands. John H. Graham's co-authors include D. Carl Freeman, John M. Emlen, E. Durant McArthur, Shmuel Raz, Hagit Hel‐Or, Eviatar Nevo, James D. Felley, Jeffrey J. Duda, Stewart C. Sanderson and Ernst Mayr and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

John H. Graham

93 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John H. Graham United States 32 1.2k 762 725 642 593 95 3.3k
Larry J. Leamy United States 38 2.0k 1.6× 282 0.4× 740 1.0× 1.6k 2.5× 502 0.8× 113 4.5k
P. A. Parsons Australia 29 946 0.8× 470 0.6× 531 0.7× 1.5k 2.3× 1.3k 2.1× 139 4.4k
Marco Corti Italy 25 1.5k 1.2× 447 0.6× 268 0.4× 855 1.3× 471 0.8× 92 3.1k
Mauro Santos Spain 35 343 0.3× 230 0.3× 362 0.5× 1.8k 2.8× 1.2k 2.0× 133 4.2k
Mihaela Pavličev United States 30 458 0.4× 170 0.2× 308 0.4× 1.2k 1.9× 506 0.9× 69 3.7k
Kevin Fowler United Kingdom 45 542 0.4× 439 0.6× 316 0.4× 2.9k 4.4× 3.8k 6.4× 113 6.5k
J. J. Rutledge United States 39 197 0.2× 205 0.3× 426 0.6× 1.8k 2.8× 621 1.0× 120 3.8k
William L. Fink United States 25 2.0k 1.7× 2.1k 2.8× 195 0.3× 794 1.2× 739 1.2× 59 5.7k
B. C. Goodwin United Kingdom 16 247 0.2× 162 0.2× 263 0.4× 580 0.9× 505 0.9× 35 2.2k
William R. Atchley United States 47 1.1k 0.9× 726 1.0× 1.6k 2.3× 2.8k 4.3× 1.6k 2.7× 149 8.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Graham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Graham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Graham. The network helps show where John H. Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Graham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Graham. John H. Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Graham, John H., et al.. (2023). Leaf Shape and Self-Mulching by Trees: A Hypothesis. Symmetry. 15(6). 1198–1198. 1 indexed citations
2.
Graham, John H.. (2021). Nature, Nurture, and Noise: Developmental Instability, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and the Causes of Phenotypic Variation. Symmetry. 13(7). 1204–1204. 27 indexed citations
3.
Graham, John H.. (2020). Fluctuating Asymmetry and Developmental Instability, a Guide to Best Practice. Symmetry. 13(1). 9–9. 23 indexed citations
4.
Graham, John H., et al.. (2019). Reproductive success of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) varies with the timing and severity of drought. PLoS ONE. 14(8). e0214266–e0214266. 5 indexed citations
5.
Block, Jessica, Daniel Crawl, Tomás Artès, et al.. (2016). FireMap: A Web Tool for Dynamic Data-Driven Predictive Wildfire Modeling Powered by the WIFIRE Cyberinfrastructure. AGUFM. 2016. 1 indexed citations
6.
Graham, John H. & Barış Özener. (2016). Fluctuating Asymmetry of Human Populations: A Review. Symmetry. 8(12). 154–154. 73 indexed citations
7.
Graham, John H., Kalin Kanov, Gregory L. Eyink, et al.. (2013). A Web-Services accessible database for channel flow turbulence at $Re_\tau$=1000. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 3 indexed citations
8.
Graham, John H., et al.. (2012). Random Phenotypic Variation of Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Single-Gene Knockouts Fits a Double Pareto-Lognormal Distribution. PLoS ONE. 7(11). e48964–e48964. 7 indexed citations
10.
Graham, John H., Anthony J. Krzysik, David A. Kovacic, et al.. (2008). Ant Community Composition Across a Gradient of Disturbed Military Landscapes at Fort Benning, Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist. 7(3). 429–448. 20 indexed citations
11.
Kumar, Anup, et al.. (2007). Intruder Identification and Response Framework for Mobile Ad hoc Networks.. Computers and Their Applications. 260–265. 9 indexed citations
12.
Graham, John H., Susan C. Jones, Anthony J. Krzysik, et al.. (2004). Habitat disturbance and the diversity and abundance of ants (Formicidae) in the Southeastern Fall-Line Sandhills. Journal of Insect Science. 4(1). 30–30. 41 indexed citations
13.
Jang, Janet K., et al.. (2000). Two Genes Required for Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Are Expressed From a Dicistronic Message. Genetics. 154(4). 1735–1746. 29 indexed citations
14.
Freeman, D. Carl, et al.. (1999). Developmental Instability as a Means of Assessing Stress in Plants: A Case Study Using Electromagnetic Fields and Soybeans. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 160(S6). S157–S166. 30 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, D. Carl, John H. Graham, David W. Byrd, E. Durant McArthur, & William Turner. (1995). Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). III. Developmental instability. American Journal of Botany. 82(9). 1144–1152. 47 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, D. Carl, et al.. (1994). Biological monitoring of environmental quality: The use of developmental instability. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 4. 6–11. 1 indexed citations
17.
Graham, John H., et al.. (1993). Effects of lead and benzene on the developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster. Ecotoxicology. 2(3). 185–195. 79 indexed citations
18.
Graham, John H. & Robert L. Balster. (1993). Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of procaine, dimethocaine and lidocaine in rats. Psychopharmacology. 110(3). 287–294. 18 indexed citations
19.
Buccafusco, Jerry J., et al.. (1989). Protection afforded by clonidine from the acute and chronic behavioral toxicity produced by the cholinesterase inhibitor soman. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 11(1). 39–44. 14 indexed citations
20.
Miller, Frederick W. & John H. Graham. (1988). Research needs and advances in inhalation dosimetry identified through the use of mathematical dosimetry models of ozone☆☆☆. Toxicology Letters. 44(3). 231–246. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026