David Thomas

61 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

David Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Religious studies 44
  • Clinical Biochemistry 58
  • Classics 23
  • Biochemistry 38
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 50
Replace Celia Deane‐Drummond with:
Celia Deane‐Drummond United Kingdom
Romola Davenport United Kingdom
Lin Mao China
Amy Styring United Kingdom
R. Michael Bourke Australia
Marco Lentini Italy
Marcel Giovanni Costa França Brazil
Bruce Albert United Kingdom
James Orr United States
Jane O’Sullivan Australia
David Thomas relative to Celia Deane‐Drummond United Kingdom Celia Deane‐Drummond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×58×
Celia Deane‐Drummond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Thomas. The network helps show where David Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Thomas Line = papers co-authored together David Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198889
2 200136
3 199335
4
Understanding Interreligious Relations
201333
5 200033
6 199524
7 197624
8
Working with People with Learning Disabilities: Theory and Practice
200323
9 198522
10 199821
11 198821
12 199520
13 197617
14 197417
15 198315
16 199514
17 196714
18 199013
19 200613
20 197513

About David Thomas

David Thomas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Ecology and Molecular Biology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (25 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (19 papers), Islamic Studies and History (15 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (3 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (3 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (44 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (58 citations), Classics (23 citations), Biochemistry (38 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (50 citations). David Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William C. Krueger, David P. Kreutzweiser, Arthur Koski, James F. Morris, A. D. Claremont, Patrick E. Clark, Larry D. Bryant, Tamzen K. Stringham, Dean G. Thompson and David Cheetham. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, Phytochemistry and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact