David Tacey

898 citations
40 papers · 439 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Jungian Analytical Psychology 17
    • Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 2
    • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 15

David Tacey

26 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

David Tacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Health 175
  • General Psychology 12
  • Philosophy 67
  • Religious studies 28
  • Social Psychology 110
Replace Harold Coward with:
Harold Coward Canada
Amanda Porterfield United States
J.A. van Belzen Netherlands
Don Browning United States
Phil Zuckerman United States
Ryan LaMothe United States
J. Gordon Melton United States
Jacob Needleman United States
Matthew Fox United Kingdom
Daniel A. Helminiak United States
David Tacey relative to Harold Coward Canada Harold Coward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Harold Coward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Tacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Tacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Tacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Tacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Tacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Tacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Tacey. The network helps show where David Tacey may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004197
2
Reenchantment: The New Australian Spirituality
200075
3
Edge of the sacred: Transformation in Australia
199540
4
The Idea of the Numinous : contemporary Jungian and psychoanalytic perspectives
200620
5 201419
6 20019
7
Remaking Men: Jung, Spirituality and Social Change
19979
8 20128
9 20137
10 20027
11 20036
12 20125
13
Gods and Diseases: Making sense of our physical and mental wellbeing
20134
14 19974
15
How to Read Jung
20063
16 20193
17 20122
18 20092
19
Religion as Metaphor: Beyond Literal Belief
20152
20 20142

About David Tacey

David Tacey is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jungian Analytical Psychology (17 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (15 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper) and Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (175 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Philosophy (67 citations), Religious studies (28 citations) and Social Psychology (110 citations). David Tacey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Their work appears in journals such as Thesis Eleven, Australian Literary Studies, International Journal of Children s Spirituality, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions and Journal of Analytical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact