David Stove
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 4
- Philosophy, Science, and History 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
- Psychology Research and Bibliometrics 1
- Co-authors
- Henry E. KyburgC. A. HookerAnthony O’HearAntony FlewKeith WindschuttleJames FranklinAndrew David Irvine
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (9 papers)Philosophy (5 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (3 papers)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Noûs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David Stove
22 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- History and Philosophy of Science 54
- Philosophy 80
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
- General Decision Sciences 3
Countries citing papers authored by David Stove
This map shows the geographic impact of David Stove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Stove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stove. The network helps show where David Stove may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Stove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 3 | Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists | 2014 | 6 |
| 4 | What's Wrong with Benevolence: Happiness, Private Property, and the Limits of Enlightenment | 2011 | 0 |
| 5 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 34 | |
| 8 | A farewell to arts | 1986 | 1 |
| 9 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1966 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 5 |
About David Stove
David Stove is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Anthropology and Demography, having authored 31 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Educational theories and practices (1 paper) and Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). David Stove has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry E. Kyburg, C. A. Hooker, Anthony O’Hear, Antony Flew, Keith Windschuttle, James Franklin and Andrew David Irvine. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.