David Scoones
Impact in
-
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Peter Newman (2 shared papers)William F. Kelly (1 shared paper)Mark T. Drayson (1 shared paper)D. C. Mangham (1 shared paper)Adam M. Benham (2 shared papers)Thomas Krausz (1 shared paper)W. P. Soutter (1 shared paper)Nandita M. deSouza (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (2 papers)British Journal of Dermatology (2 papers)Public Choice (1 paper)Acta Neurochirurgica (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
David Scoones
20 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Cell Biology 72
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
- Physiology 14
- Dermatology 27
- Rheumatology 46
Countries citing papers authored by David Scoones
This map shows the geographic impact of David Scoones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Scoones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Scoones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Scoones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Scoones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Scoones. The network helps show where David Scoones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Scoones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About David Scoones
David Scoones is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Rheumatology and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (2 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (72 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations), Physiology (14 citations), Dermatology (27 citations) and Rheumatology (46 citations). David Scoones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Newman, William F. Kelly, Mark T. Drayson, D. C. Mangham, Adam M. Benham, Thomas Krausz, W. P. Soutter, Nandita M. deSouza, D. J. Gilderdale and Marcel van Lith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, British Journal of Dermatology, Public Choice, Acta Neurochirurgica and Journal of Clinical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.