David Schnarch

810 citations
14 papers · 493 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David Schnarch

13 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

David Schnarch
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Clinical Psychology 256
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 165
  • Social Psychology 232
  • Gender Studies 64
  • Health 36
Replace Natalie Dove with:
Natalie Dove United States
Stephen L. O’Keefe United States
Ryan B. Seedall United States
Chelom E. Leavitt United States
Kenneth J. Hemphill Canada
L. C. Joyce Hong Kong
Jerry L. Jennings United States
Sherwyn M. Woods United States
Ben N. Ard United States
Paul Okami United States
David Schnarch relative to Natalie Dove United States Natalie Dove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natalie Dove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schnarch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schnarch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schnarch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schnarch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schnarch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schnarch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schnarch. The network helps show where David Schnarch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside David Schnarch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schnarch Line = papers co-authored together David Schnarch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Constructing the Sexual Crucible : An Integration of Sexual and Marital Therapy
1991193
2
Passionate marriage : love, sex, and intimacy in emotionally committed relationships
199764
3
Passionate Marriage : Keeping Love and Intimacy Alive in Committed Relationships
199752
4 201139
5 199738
6
Desire problems: A systemic perspective.
200022
7 198121
8 198016
9 198113
10 197912
11 19908
12 19978
13 19826
14 20081

About David Schnarch

David Schnarch is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Gender Studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (256 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations), Social Psychology (232 citations), Gender Studies (64 citations) and Health (36 citations). David Schnarch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John E. Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Psychotherapy, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Psychosomatics and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact