David Saunders

25 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

David Saunders
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 146
  • Spectroscopy 121
  • Filtration and Separation 11
  • Pharmaceutical Science 31
  • Organic Chemistry 131
Replace J.A. Christopher with:
J.A. Christopher United Kingdom
Michael Kranz United Kingdom
Peter Klein United States
Amy Quinn United States
H. Wendt United States
Martin Tremblay Canada
Mark Rogers‐Evans Switzerland
Robert H. Pearson United States
Philip S. Jackson United Kingdom
Patrick Schnider Switzerland
David Saunders relative to J.A. Christopher United Kingdom J.A. Christopher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
J.A. Christopher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Saunders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Saunders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Saunders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Saunders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Saunders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Saunders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Saunders. The network helps show where David Saunders may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Saunders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Saunders Line = papers co-authored together David Saunders links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988417
2 201661
3 200228
4 199720
5 199318
6 201416
7 201514
8
Italian Renaissance drawings : technical examination and analysis
201013
9 200611
10 19969
11 20247
12 20177
13 20185
14 19803
15
Conservation and access : contributions to the London Congress, 15-19 September 2008
20083
16 19983
17 19862
18 20112
19 20202
20 19832

About David Saunders

David Saunders is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Ancient Near East History (2 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (146 citations), Spectroscopy (121 citations), Filtration and Separation (11 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (31 citations) and Organic Chemistry (131 citations). David Saunders has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rodney C. Young, Martin L. Jones, Robin M Griffiths, C. Robin Ganellin, Thomas H. Brown, Ian R. Smith, Robert Cameron Mitchell, Helen Clegg, Chris A Roe and Graham Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, The American Historical Review, Economy and Society and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact