David S. Ensing
Impact in
- Health top 0.5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Papers in
- Health 5
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 5
-
- Religion, Society, and Development 3
- Co-authors
- Sharon Young (1 shared paper)Kenneth I. Pargäment (5 shared papers)Barbara Reilly (4 shared papers)Kimberly Van Haitsma (3 shared papers)H Olsen (3 shared papers)Richard Warren (1 shared paper)Robert Elliott (1 shared paper)Richard M. Warren (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2 papers)Professional Psychology Research and Practice (2 papers)Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (2 papers)American Journal of Community Psychology (1 paper)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David S. Ensing
9 papers receiving 983 citations
David S. Ensing's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Health 625
- Clinical Psychology 492
- General Health Professions 349
- Social Psychology 266
- Applied Psychology 55
Countries citing papers authored by David S. Ensing
This map shows the geographic impact of David S. Ensing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David S. Ensing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David S. Ensing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David S. Ensing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David S. Ensing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David S. Ensing. The network helps show where David S. Ensing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside David S. Ensing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | God help me: (I): Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events Hit paper breakdown → | 1990 | 553 |
| 2 | 1999 | 330 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 127 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 54 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 9 |
About David S. Ensing
David S. Ensing is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (625 citations), Clinical Psychology (492 citations), General Health Professions (349 citations), Social Psychology (266 citations) and Applied Psychology (55 citations). David S. Ensing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Young, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Barbara Reilly, Kimberly Van Haitsma, H Olsen, Richard Warren, Robert Elliott, Richard M. Warren, Michal Kelemen and Paul Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, American Journal of Community Psychology and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.