Gene G. Ano

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Gene G. Ano is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gene G. Ano has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Health, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Gene G. Ano's work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers). Gene G. Ano is often cited by papers focused on Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers). Gene G. Ano collaborates with scholars based in United States. Gene G. Ano's co-authors include Kenneth I. Pargäment, Amy Wachholtz, Nalini Tarakeshwar, Joan Duggan, Nichole A. Murray‐Swank, Russell E. Phillips, Serena Wong and Mary A. Fukuyama and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Southern Medical Journal and Mental Health Religion & Culture.

In The Last Decade

Gene G. Ano

8 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: ... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 250 500 750 1000

Peers

Gene G. Ano
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health 1.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 733
  • Sociology and Political Science 538
  • Social Psychology 403
  • General Health Professions 170
Replace Kathleen Galek with:
Kathleen Galek United States
David S. Ensing United States
J. B. Kingree United States
Emma Howarth United Kingdom
Sian Cotton United States
Robert L. Peralta United States
Marie Murphy United States
Holly Nelson-Becker United States
Ian Manion Canada
Roxane Agnew-Davies United Kingdom
Kathleen Galek United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Gene G. Ano
Gene G. Ano · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Gene G. Ano
Gene G. Ano · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Gene G. Ano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene G. Ano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene G. Ano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene G. Ano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gene G. Ano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene G. Ano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene G. Ano. The network helps show where Gene G. Ano may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gene G. Ano

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gene G. Ano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gene G. Ano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gene G. Ano. Gene G. Ano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 16
3
The Religious Dimension of Coping: Advances in Theory, Research, and Practice
99
4 71
5 7
6 29
7
Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis breakdown →
1114
8 93

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026