David Reed

84 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

David Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Computer Science Applications 261
  • Software 53
  • Plant Science 448
  • Soil Science 113
  • Media Technology 77
Replace Chi N. Thai with:
Chi N. Thai United States
Shiyu Wang China
David J. Barnes United Kingdom
Jacqueline Whalley New Zealand
Jussi Nikander Finland
Haiyan Zhang China
Jirapond Muangprathub Thailand
Muhammad Ilyas Pakistan
Santanu Phadikar India
Anna Bilska‐Kos Poland
David Reed relative to Chi N. Thai United States Chi N. Thai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.6×
Chi N. Thai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Reed. The network helps show where David Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Reed Line = papers co-authored together David Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2
Spiraling CS2013 knowledge units across a small CS curriculum
20171
3
Hunt the WUMPUS
20170
4
Critical thinking and modeling in CS0: the Prisoner's Dilemma
20110
5
Sometimes style really does matter
20103
6
Roulette simulations and Martingale betting: nifty assignment
20100
7
The convergence of computer programming and graphic design
20066
8 20058
9 20041
10 200413
11 200422
12 20041
13
The use of ill-defined problems for developing problem-solving and empirical skills in CS1
200214
14 199826
15 199821
16 199810
17 199140
18 19785
19 197810
20 19525

About David Reed

David Reed is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Software, Plant Science, Media Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 94 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (31 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (18 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (10 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (9 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (8 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (8 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (261 citations), Software (53 citations), Plant Science (448 citations), Soil Science (113 citations) and Media Technology (77 citations). David Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Peru. Frequent co-authors include H. B. Tukey, Owen Astrachan, Luis Alonso Valdéz-Aguilar, Grant Braught, Craig S. Miller, David Byrne, Donald Loveland, Claire-Lise Rosenfield, Richard H. Loeppert and Yan Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, HortScience, Journal of Environmental Horticulture, HortTechnology and Journal of Plant Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026