David R. Paine
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography
- Co-authors
- Steven J. SandagePeter J. JankowskiPeter C. HillEsther S. TungJulie J. ExlineDon E. DavisJoshua N. HookKathryn A. Johnson
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (12 papers)Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (9 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of ParamedicineJournal of Religion and HealthPsychoanalytic Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayAustralia
In The Last Decade
David R. Paine
23 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Social Psychology 165
- Clinical Psychology 164
- Health 156
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Demography 30
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Paine
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Paine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Paine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Paine. The network helps show where David R. Paine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Paine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Paine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Paine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Paine. David R. Paine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Psychology, Faith, and Training: Humility and Mature Alterity for Graduate Study | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | An Engaging Leadership Framework (ELF) Project investigating how Gen Y students learn | 1 |
About David R. Paine
David R. Paine is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (12 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (9 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (156 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations) and Clinical Psychology (164 citations). David R. Paine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Sandage, Peter J. Jankowski, Peter C. Hill, Esther S. Tung, Julie J. Exline, Don E. Davis, Joshua N. Hook, Kathryn A. Johnson, Daniel Hauge and Chance A. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Journal of Religion and Health and Psychoanalytic Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.