David R. Jung
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- D. R. FranklDeanna GreensteinMarge LenaneJudith L. RapoportTom NugentPaul M. ThompsonLiv ClasenWu Ma
- Topics
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers)Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (5 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers)
- Journals
- Physical review. B, Condensed matterJournal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films
- Partner nations
- United StatesSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
David R. Jung
12 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 81
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 77
- Biomedical Engineering 76
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 56
- Cognitive Neuroscience 52
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Jung
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Jung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Jung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Jung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Jung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Jung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Jung. The network helps show where David R. Jung may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Jung
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Jung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Jung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Jung. David R. Jung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 105 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 10 |
About David R. Jung
David R. Jung is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biophysics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (5 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (81 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (56 citations). David R. Jung has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include D. R. Frankl, Deanna Greenstein, Marge Lenane, Judith L. Rapoport, Tom Nugent, Paul M. Thompson, Liv Clasen, Wu Ma, Ellen Leibenluft and Jay N. Giedd. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.