David Pitt
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Small Animals top 1%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 11
- Genetics top 5%
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 6
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
-
- Child and Adolescent Health 10
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 5
-
- Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery 5
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 5
- Neonatal Health and Biochemistry 4
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 4
- Co-authors
- W.W. ThatcherR.J. CollierD. E. BuffingtonI. J. HopkinsDavid M. DanksA.G. BaikieSenga WhittinghamDeewakar Sharma
- Journals
- The Medical Journal of Australia (25 papers)Journal of Medical Genetics (5 papers)The Lancet (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
David Pitt
75 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Animal Science and Zoology 653
- Small Animals 249
- Clinical Biochemistry 152
- Genetics 460
- Agronomy and Crop Science 135
Countries citing papers authored by David Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of David Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pitt. The network helps show where David Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field odour assessments for estimating odour concentrations | 2014 | 1 |
| 2 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 41 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1971 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1967 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1965 | 60 | |
| 18 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1957 | 25 |
About David Pitt
David Pitt is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Biochemistry and General Health Professions, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (10 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (6 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (4 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (653 citations), Small Animals (249 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (152 citations), Genetics (460 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (135 citations). David Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include W.W. Thatcher, R.J. Collier, D. E. Buffington, I. J. Hopkins, David M. Danks, A.G. Baikie, Senga Whittingham, Deewakar Sharma, Lauren Grace Mackey and John Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Medical Genetics, The Lancet, Clinical Genetics and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.