David P. Roberts
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Algebra and Number Theory
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- John A. KnaffKatherine A. WintersCharles R. SampsonAndrea SchumacherMark DeMariaRobert T. DeMariaDaniel P. BrownMichael J. Brennan
- Topics
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (19 papers)Advanced Algebra and Geometry (11 papers)Analytic Number Theory Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
David P. Roberts
28 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Geometry and Topology 122
- Mathematical Physics 86
- Atmospheric Science 74
- Algebra and Number Theory 49
- Global and Planetary Change 40
Countries citing papers authored by David P. Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of David P. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David P. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David P. Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David P. Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David P. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David P. Roberts. The network helps show where David P. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David P. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David P. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David P. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David P. Roberts. David P. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Wild Partitions and Number Theory | 4 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | Sextic Number Fields with Discriminant - j 2 a 3 b | 1 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Shimura curves analogous to X〓0〓(N) | 19 |
About David P. Roberts
David P. Roberts is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (19 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (11 papers) and Analytic Number Theory Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (122 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (49 citations) and Mathematical Physics (86 citations). David P. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include John A. Knaff, Katherine A. Winters, Charles R. Sampson, Andrea Schumacher, Mark DeMaria, Robert T. DeMaria, Daniel P. Brown, Michael J. Brennan, David Sharp and Richard D. Knabb. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Economics Letters and Weather and Forecasting.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.