David Newbury

1.5k citations
64 papers · 619 indexed · h-index 14

David Newbury

61 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

David Newbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Anthropology 211
  • Archeology 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 420
  • Space and Planetary Science 12
  • Political Science and International Relations 171
Replace Edna G. Bay with:
Edna G. Bay United States
Oscar Salemink Algeria
Enid Schildkrout United States
Catherine Besteman United States
Jean‐Loup Amselle France
Bogumił Jewsiewicki Canada
David Birmingham United Kingdom
Mahir Şaul United States
Burton Stein United States
G. I. Jones United Kingdom
David Newbury relative to Edna G. Bay United States Edna G. Bay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Edna G. Bay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Newbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Newbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Newbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Newbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Newbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Newbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Newbury. The network helps show where David Newbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Newbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Newbury Line = papers co-authored together David Newbury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20165
2 20091
3 20091
4 20091
5 200911
6 20092
7 20081
8 20071
9 20071
10 20071
11 20061
12
Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial African Issues
20051
13 19983
14
Irredentist Rwanda: Ethnic and Territorial Frontiers in Central Africa
199719
15 19961
16 19964
17
Rwanda: The Politics of Turmoil
19946
18
African history research trends and perspectives on the future
19872
19 198713
20
Kings and clans in Ijwi Island (Zaire), c.1780-1840
19792

About David Newbury

David Newbury is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 64 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (17 papers), African history and culture studies (15 papers), African history and culture analysis (11 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (9 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (7 papers), South African History and Culture (6 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (211 citations), Archeology (18 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (420 citations). David Newbury has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Catharine Newbury, David Schoenbrun, Thomas Q. Reefe, Bogumił Jewsiewicki, Joseph C. Miller, Bethwell A. Ogot, Edward I. Steinhart, Robert W. July, Robert Harms and T. O. Beidelman. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Comparative Studies in Society and History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026