Enid Schildkrout

76 total papers · 1.1k total citations
37 papers, 519 citations indexed

About

Enid Schildkrout is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Museology. According to data from OpenAlex, Enid Schildkrout has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 519 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Anthropology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Museology. Recurrent topics in Enid Schildkrout's work include African history and culture studies (12 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers) and African history and culture analysis (4 papers). Enid Schildkrout is often cited by papers focused on African history and culture studies (12 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers) and African history and culture analysis (4 papers). Enid Schildkrout collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Enid Schildkrout's co-authors include Sandra T. Barnes, Curtis A. Keim, Jean Allman, Paul Gray, Frederick Quinn, Paul E. Lovejoy, Christraud M. Geary, Richard Michael Gramly, Phillips Stevens and Arthur C. Danto and has published in prestigious journals such as Academic Medicine, Annual Review of Anthropology and Current Anthropology.

In The Last Decade

Enid Schildkrout

31 papers receiving 368 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Enid Schildkrout 185 185 74 63 62 37 519
Frances E. Mascia‐Lees 231 1.2× 117 0.6× 86 1.2× 17 0.3× 46 0.7× 21 505
Pauline Turner Strong 231 1.2× 141 0.8× 60 0.8× 12 0.2× 83 1.3× 28 618
Anna Grimshaw 294 1.6× 152 0.8× 40 0.5× 45 0.7× 47 0.8× 38 585
Carolyn J. Dean 197 1.1× 65 0.4× 41 0.6× 43 0.7× 82 1.3× 44 580
Soumhya Venkatesan 204 1.1× 228 1.2× 37 0.5× 28 0.4× 128 2.1× 38 538
Hilda Kuper 210 1.1× 174 0.9× 27 0.4× 31 0.5× 56 0.9× 38 473
Sasha Newell 267 1.4× 177 1.0× 21 0.3× 32 0.5× 68 1.1× 21 459
Roxana Waterson 322 1.7× 122 0.7× 43 0.6× 17 0.3× 86 1.4× 36 603
W. J. Rorabaugh 212 1.1× 49 0.3× 32 0.4× 17 0.3× 90 1.5× 49 598
Kate Darian‐Smith 360 1.9× 69 0.4× 24 0.3× 32 0.5× 110 1.8× 82 609

Countries citing papers authored by Enid Schildkrout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Enid Schildkrout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enid Schildkrout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enid Schildkrout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Enid Schildkrout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enid Schildkrout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enid Schildkrout. The network helps show where Enid Schildkrout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enid Schildkrout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enid Schildkrout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enid Schildkrout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Enid Schildkrout. Enid Schildkrout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026