David N. Keys

3.2k citations
21 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 13

David N. Keys

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David N. Keys
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 331
  • Genetics 415
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 254
  • Cancer Research 205
  • Molecular Biology 555
Replace Hiroshi Tarui with:
Hiroshi Tarui Japan
Martina Rembold Germany
Elena Silva Casey United States
Gerald Stampfel Austria
J. L. Weber United States
Derek Lemons United States
Jane Reiland United States
Akimasa Fukui Japan
Juan Pablo Couso United Kingdom
Dorothea Godt Canada
David N. Keys relative to Hiroshi Tarui Japan Hiroshi Tarui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Hiroshi Tarui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David N. Keys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Keys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Keys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Keys. The network helps show where David N. Keys may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David N. Keys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David N. Keys Line = papers co-authored together David N. Keys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201613
2 20161
3 201512
4 20152
5 2013171
6 20133
7 20123
8 201137
9 20104
10 200889
11 200637
12
A saturation screen for cis-acting regulatory DNA in the Hox genes of Ciona intestinalis
20053
13 200528
14 200439
15 20034
16 200240
17 200282
18 1999242
19 199873
20 1994292

About David N. Keys

David N. Keys is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (331 citations), Genetics (415 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (254 citations), Cancer Research (205 citations) and Molecular Biology (555 citations). David N. Keys has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sean B. Carroll, Julie Gates, Jane E. Selegue, Jim A. Williams, Grace Panganiban, Stephen W. Paddock, Michael Levine, Caifu Chen, Naoe Harafuji and David L. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Cellular Physiology and BMC Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026