Stephen W. Paddock
- Biophysics top 1%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 15
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques 9
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 4
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 5
- bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 4
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 2
- Aging top 10%
-
- Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging 3
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Co-authors
- Sean B. CarrollJim A. WilliamsCarol A. SattlerGrace PanganibanJane E. SelegueDavid N. KeysJulie GatesGerald Schatten
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen W. Paddock
32 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Biophysics 220
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 386
- Cell Biology 335
- Molecular Biology 972
- Aging 24
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Paddock
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Paddock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Paddock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Paddock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Paddock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Paddock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Paddock. The network helps show where Stephen W. Paddock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen W. Paddock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 118 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 64 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 126 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 215 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 292 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 72 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 75 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 8 |
About Stephen W. Paddock
Stephen W. Paddock is a scholar working on Biophysics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (15 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (9 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (5 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers) and Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (220 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (386 citations), Cell Biology (335 citations), Molecular Biology (972 citations) and Aging (24 citations). Stephen W. Paddock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sean B. Carroll, Jim A. Williams, Carol A. Sattler, Grace Panganiban, Jane E. Selegue, David N. Keys, Julie Gates, Gerald Schatten, Victoria E. Centonze and Stephen A. Stricker. Their work appears in journals such as BioTechniques, Current Biology, Journal of Microscopy, Developmental Biology and Journal of Cell Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.