Michael B. Blackburn
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard H. ffrench‐ConstantDavid BowenDale B. GelmanAshok K. RainaJing HuThomas A. RocheleauPhyllis A. W. MartinDawn E. Gundersen‐Rindal
- Topics
- Insect Resistance and Genetics (31 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (19 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (18 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePLoS ONEDevelopment
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandBelgium
In The Last Decade
Michael B. Blackburn
71 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Insect Science 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 940
- Plant Science 650
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 555
- Genetics 394
Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. Blackburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. Blackburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. Blackburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. Blackburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. Blackburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. Blackburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. Blackburn. The network helps show where Michael B. Blackburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael B. Blackburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael B. Blackburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael B. Blackburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael B. Blackburn. Michael B. Blackburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 104 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 101 |
About Michael B. Blackburn
Michael B. Blackburn is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biotechnology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (31 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (19 papers) and Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (555 citations) and Plant Science (650 citations). Michael B. Blackburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. ffrench‐Constant, David Bowen, Dale B. Gelman, Ashok K. Raina, Jing Hu, Thomas A. Rocheleau, Phyllis A. W. Martin, Dawn E. Gundersen‐Rindal, Olga Andreev and R. Bhartia. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.