David N. Erceg

433 total citations
9 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

David N. Erceg is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David N. Erceg has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Physiology, 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in David N. Erceg's work include Body Composition Measurement Techniques (6 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (5 papers) and Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (2 papers). David N. Erceg is often cited by papers focused on Body Composition Measurement Techniques (6 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (5 papers) and Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (2 papers). David N. Erceg collaborates with scholars based in United States. David N. Erceg's co-authors include E. Todd Schroeder, Lindsey Anderson, Christina M. Dieli‐Conwright, Stephanie Sun, Nicole E. Jensky, Marc J. Weigensberg, Christianne J. Lane and Nicole C.A. Strock and has published in prestigious journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, British Journal Of Nutrition and Nutrition Research.

In The Last Decade

David N. Erceg

8 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

David N. Erceg

PHYSI

OSM

PHEOH

CAM

ND

Björn Jensen Germany

Cherilyn McLester United States

Emi Yamagata Japan

A Pietrobelli Italy

Takashi Nakagata Japan

Grant E. van der Ploeg Australia

Tetsuya Sato Japan

A Bosy‐Westphal Germany

F. RUBIANO United States

Julian Owen United Kingdom

Björn Jensen Germany

David N. Erceg

384 ×1.7

PHYSI

41 ×0.6

OSM

63 ×1.0

PHEOH

22 ×0.6

CAM

40 ×1.3

ND

Citations per year, relative to David N. Erceg David N. Erceg (= 1×) peers Björn Jensen

Countries citing papers authored by David N. Erceg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Erceg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Erceg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Erceg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Erceg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Erceg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Erceg. The network helps show where David N. Erceg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David N. Erceg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David N. Erceg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David N. Erceg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David N. Erceg. David N. Erceg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Strock, Nicole C.A., et al.. (2024). The role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for menstrual pain relief: A randomized control trial. Women s Health. 20. 912677143–912677143.

2.

Erceg, David N., et al.. (2020). <p>Validation of an Automated and Adjustable Blood Pressure System for Use with a Public Health Station</p>. Vascular Health and Risk Management. Volume 16. 133–142. 2 indexed citations

3.

Erceg, David N., et al.. (2015). Changes in Bone Biomarkers, BMC, and Insulin Resistance Following a 10-Week Whole Body Vibration Exercise Program in Overweight Latino Boys. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 12(6). 494–501. 18 indexed citations

4.

Anderson, Lindsey, David N. Erceg, & E. Todd Schroeder. (2014). Utility of multi‐frequency bioelectrical impedance compared to deuterium dilution for assessment of total body water. Nutrition & Dietetics. 72(2). 183–189. 14 indexed citations

5.

Anderson, Lindsey, David N. Erceg, & E. Todd Schroeder. (2012). Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women. Nutrition Research. 32(7). 479–485. 135 indexed citations

6.

Anderson, Lindsey, David N. Erceg, & E. Todd Schroeder. (2011). Utility of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Compared to DEXA for Assessment of Regional Lean Mass. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 43(5). 316–316. 2 indexed citations

7.

Erceg, David N., et al.. (2010). The Stayhealthy bioelectrical impedance analyzer predicts body fat in children and adults. Nutrition Research. 30(5). 297–304. 30 indexed citations

8.

Sun, Stephanie, et al.. (2009). Validation Of The ReeVue™ And CardioCoachCo2™ Metabolic Systems For Measuring Resting Energy Expenditure. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 41(5). 42–42. 5 indexed citations

9.

Dieli‐Conwright, Christina M., et al.. (2008). Validity and reliability of body composition analysers in children and adults. British Journal Of Nutrition. 100(4). 859–865. 137 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact