David M. Sandford
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 5
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 3
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 2
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 3
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
-
- Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis 1
- Co-authors
- Alan CarsonRichard ThwaitesRory C. O’ConnorOlivia J KirtleyJaime DelgadilloMelanie Simmonds‐BuckleyWolfgang LutzAnne‐Katharina Deisenhofer
- Journals
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
David M. Sandford
10 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Emergency Medicine 92
- Clinical Psychology 110
- Neurology 79
- Epidemiology 142
- Applied Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by David M. Sandford
This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Sandford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Sandford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Sandford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Sandford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Sandford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Sandford. The network helps show where David M. Sandford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside David M. Sandford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 145 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 25 |
About David M. Sandford
David M. Sandford is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (92 citations), Clinical Psychology (110 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). David M. Sandford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Alan Carson, Richard Thwaites, Rory C. O’Connor, Olivia J Kirtley, Jaime Delgadillo, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Wolfgang Lutz, Anne‐Katharina Deisenhofer, Claire Bone and Julian Rubel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.