Neil Rutterford

477 total citations
10 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Neil Rutterford is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Rutterford has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 3 papers in Emergency Medicine and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Neil Rutterford's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). Neil Rutterford is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). Neil Rutterford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Neil Rutterford's co-authors include Rodger Ll. Wood, Nick Alderman, Robert J. Wood, Olga Bazanova, Søren Bo Andersen, D. Vernon, Catherine Watson, Caroline Knight and Keith M. Dawson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Injury.

In The Last Decade

Neil Rutterford

10 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Neil Rutterford United Kingdom 8 196 109 80 79 75 10 324
Richard Temple United States 11 158 0.8× 76 0.7× 81 1.0× 59 0.7× 48 0.6× 24 321
William Garmoe United States 9 209 1.1× 116 1.1× 114 1.4× 55 0.7× 59 0.8× 11 364
Cheryl L. Bradbury Canada 9 234 1.2× 111 1.0× 88 1.1× 59 0.7× 102 1.4× 10 421
Daniela Silvestro Italy 9 268 1.4× 111 1.0× 118 1.5× 48 0.6× 50 0.7× 13 357
Lynne Davis United States 10 316 1.6× 169 1.6× 79 1.0× 80 1.0× 90 1.2× 15 478
Raffaella Cattelani Italy 9 299 1.5× 166 1.5× 114 1.4× 109 1.4× 81 1.1× 13 458
Eva Azicnuda Italy 11 302 1.5× 132 1.2× 147 1.8× 49 0.6× 52 0.7× 14 402
Anne L. Shandera‐Ochsner United States 9 200 1.0× 83 0.8× 87 1.1× 66 0.8× 122 1.6× 16 331
Shital Pavawalla United States 8 263 1.3× 172 1.6× 166 2.1× 52 0.7× 51 0.7× 9 366
F. Colin Wilson United Kingdom 13 185 0.9× 94 0.9× 147 1.8× 65 0.8× 44 0.6× 29 382

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Rutterford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Rutterford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Rutterford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Rutterford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Rutterford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Rutterford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Rutterford. The network helps show where Neil Rutterford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Rutterford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Rutterford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Rutterford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Rutterford. Neil Rutterford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Rutterford, Neil, et al.. (2019). Comparison of thermographic, EEG and subjective measures of affective experience of designed stimuli.. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 3(2). 53–65. 2 indexed citations
2.
Vernon, D., et al.. (2009). Alpha Neurofeedback Training for Performance Enhancement: Reviewing the Methodology. Journal of Neurotherapy. 13(4). 214–227. 49 indexed citations
3.
Wood, Rodger Ll. & Neil Rutterford. (2006). The impact of mild developmental learning difficulties on neuropsychological recovery from head trauma. Brain Injury. 20(5). 477–484. 3 indexed citations
4.
Rutterford, Neil, et al.. (2006). Evaluating a theory of stress and adjustment when predicting long-term psychosocial outcome after brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 12(3). 359–367. 34 indexed citations
5.
Wood, Rodger Ll. & Neil Rutterford. (2006). Demographic and cognitive predictors of long-term psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 12(3). 350–358. 132 indexed citations
6.
Wood, Robert J. & Neil Rutterford. (2006). The effect of litigation on long term cognitive and psychosocial outcome after severe brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 21(3). 239–246. 15 indexed citations
7.
Wood, Rodger Ll. & Neil Rutterford. (2004). Relationships between measured cognitive ability and reported psychosocial activity after bilateral frontal lobe injury: An 18‐year follow‐up. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 14(3). 329–350. 19 indexed citations
9.
Watson, Catherine, et al.. (2001). Reduction of chronic aggressive behaviour 10 years after brain injury. Brain Injury. 15(11). 1003–1015. 36 indexed citations
10.
Alderman, Nick, et al.. (2001). A comparison of the validity of self-report measures amongst people with acquired brain injury: A preliminary study of the usefulness of EuroQol-5D. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 11(5). 529–537. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026