Eliane Deschrijver

1.2k total citations
21 papers, 505 citations indexed

About

Eliane Deschrijver is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eliane Deschrijver has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 505 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eliane Deschrijver's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Eliane Deschrijver is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Eliane Deschrijver collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Australia and United States. Eliane Deschrijver's co-authors include Marcel Braß, Jan R. Wiersema, Lara Bardi, Charlotte Desmet, Davide Rigoni, Lize De Coster, Colin J. Palmer, Emiel Cracco, Oliver Genschow and Vera Hoorens and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Eliane Deschrijver

20 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eliane Deschrijver Belgium 13 335 245 131 90 83 21 505
Sarah Ketay United States 11 340 1.0× 454 1.9× 105 0.8× 244 2.7× 146 1.8× 17 795
Nicolas Stefaniak France 11 214 0.6× 106 0.4× 190 1.5× 70 0.8× 122 1.5× 25 565
Maria Arioli Italy 12 248 0.7× 202 0.8× 43 0.3× 93 1.0× 60 0.7× 28 444
Lara Maliske Germany 6 274 0.8× 203 0.8× 48 0.4× 123 1.4× 85 1.0× 9 465
Katie Hoemann United States 15 340 1.0× 337 1.4× 115 0.9× 379 4.2× 142 1.7× 31 823
Line Gebauer Denmark 13 339 1.0× 110 0.4× 88 0.7× 85 0.9× 224 2.7× 21 578
Katherine Rice Warnell United States 10 170 0.5× 142 0.6× 129 1.0× 65 0.7× 100 1.2× 19 323
Sandy Overgaauw Netherlands 11 229 0.7× 190 0.8× 42 0.3× 180 2.0× 228 2.7× 16 557
Gillian Slessor United Kingdom 16 434 1.3× 220 0.9× 77 0.6× 233 2.6× 50 0.6× 29 675
Javier Rodríguez‐Ferreiro Spain 16 528 1.6× 224 0.9× 311 2.4× 165 1.8× 32 0.4× 58 807

Countries citing papers authored by Eliane Deschrijver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliane Deschrijver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliane Deschrijver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliane Deschrijver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliane Deschrijver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliane Deschrijver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliane Deschrijver. The network helps show where Eliane Deschrijver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliane Deschrijver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliane Deschrijver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliane Deschrijver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliane Deschrijver. Eliane Deschrijver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Deschrijver, Eliane & Richard Ramsey. (2025). Unequal resource division occurs in the absence of group division and identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(7). e2413797122–e2413797122.
2.
Kaplan, David M., et al.. (2024). Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024). Clinical Psychology Review. 115. 102530–102530. 3 indexed citations
3.
Deschrijver, Eliane, et al.. (2024). Measurement validity and the integrative approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 47. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kaplan, David M., et al.. (2023). Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping review. Clinical Psychology Review. 108. 102378–102378. 23 indexed citations
5.
Hoorens, Vera, Sasha Scambler, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.. (2022). Comparative Optimism, Self-Superiority, Egocentric Impact Perception and Health Information Seeking: A COVID-19 Study. Psychologica Belgica. 62(1). 152–165. 12 indexed citations
6.
Asimakopoulou, Koula, Vera Hoorens, Ewen Speed, et al.. (2020). Comparative optimism about infection and recovery from COVID‐19; Implications for adherence with lockdown advice. Health Expectations. 23(6). 1502–1511. 28 indexed citations
7.
Deschrijver, Eliane & Colin J. Palmer. (2020). Reframing social cognition: Relational versus representational mentalizing.. Psychological Bulletin. 146(11). 941–969. 38 indexed citations
8.
9.
Cracco, Emiel, Lara Bardi, Charlotte Desmet, et al.. (2018). Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis.. Psychological Bulletin. 144(5). 453–500. 136 indexed citations
10.
Braem, Senne, Annabel D. Nijhof, Davide Rigoni, et al.. (2018). Sensory Prediction Errors Are Less Modulated by Global Context in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 3(8). 667–674. 51 indexed citations
11.
Deschrijver, Eliane, et al.. (2018). Temporal binding effect in the action observation domain: Evidence from an action-based somatosensory paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition. 60. 1–8. 7 indexed citations
12.
Deschrijver, Eliane, Jan R. Wiersema, & Marcel Braß. (2017). Disentangling Neural Sources of the Motor Interference Effect in High Functioning Autism: An EEG-Study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 47(3). 690–700. 11 indexed citations
13.
Coster, Lize De, Jan R. Wiersema, Eliane Deschrijver, & Marcel Braß. (2017). The effect of being imitated on empathy for pain in adults with high-functioning autism: Disturbed self–other distinction leads to altered empathic responding. Autism. 22(6). 712–727. 15 indexed citations
14.
Deschrijver, Eliane, et al.. (2017). When Praising Yourself Insults Others: Self-Superiority Claims Provoke Aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 43(7). 1008–1019. 19 indexed citations
15.
Deschrijver, Eliane, Jan R. Wiersema, & Marcel Braß. (2016). The influence of action observation on action execution: Dissociating the contribution of action on perception, perception on action, and resolving conflict. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 17(2). 381–393. 21 indexed citations
16.
Deschrijver, Eliane, Jan R. Wiersema, & Marcel Braß. (2016). Action-based touch observation in adults with high functioning autism: Can compromised self-other distinction abilities link social and sensory everyday problems?. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 12(2). 273–282. 19 indexed citations
17.
Deschrijver, Eliane, Jan R. Wiersema, & Marcel Braß. (2015). The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: an action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 11(7). 1162–1172. 28 indexed citations
18.
Fini, Chiara, Giorgia Committeri, Barbara C. N. Müller, Eliane Deschrijver, & Marcel Braß. (2015). How Watching Pinocchio Movies Changes Our Subjective Experience of Extrapersonal Space. PLoS ONE. 10(3). e0120306–e0120306. 9 indexed citations
19.
Deschrijver, Eliane, Lara Bardi, Jan R. Wiersema, & Marcel Braß. (2015). Behavioral measures of implicit theory of mind in adults with high functioning autism. Cognitive Neuroscience. 7(1-4). 192–202. 35 indexed citations
20.
Desmet, Charlotte, Eliane Deschrijver, & Marcel Braß. (2013). How social is error observation? The neural mechanisms underlying the observation of human and machine errors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 9(4). 427–435. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Ketay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicolas Stefaniak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria Arioli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lara Maliske Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katie Hoemann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Line Gebauer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine Rice Warnell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandy Overgaauw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gillian Slessor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Javier Rodríguez‐Ferreiro
Rankless by CCL
2026