David M. Chacko
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Iqbal AhmadJames TurnerJim RogersDan BylundAni V. DasJackson JamesXing ZhaoSumitra Bhattacharya
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David M. Chacko
12 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Molecular Biology 316
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 148
- Ophthalmology 104
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 91
- Developmental Neuroscience 70
Countries citing papers authored by David M. Chacko
This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Chacko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Chacko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Chacko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Chacko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Chacko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Chacko. The network helps show where David M. Chacko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Chacko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Chacko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Chacko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Chacko. David M. Chacko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | Lysophosphatidic acid receptor signaling in mammalian retinal pigment epithelial cells. | 5 |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 127 | |
| 6 | Characterization of alpha2 adrenergic receptor subtypes in human ocular tissue homogenates. | 40 |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | Alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in the bovine retina. Presence of only the alpha-2D subtype. | 17 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 13 |
About David M. Chacko
David M. Chacko is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (70 citations), Ophthalmology (104 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (148 citations). David M. Chacko has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Iqbal Ahmad, James Turner, Jim Rogers, Dan Bylund, Ani V. Das, Jackson James, Xing Zhao, Sumitra Bhattacharya, Wallace B. Thoreson and Carl B. Camras. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.