David Lovelock

39 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations1971202619892007197150010001.5k

Peers

David Lovelock
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.5k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 883
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 202
  • Applied Mathematics 147
Replace H. A. Buchdahl with:
H. A. Buchdahl Australia
W. B. Bonnor United Kingdom
G. David Kerlick United States
Orlando Luongo Italy
I. Jack United Kingdom
Douglas M. Eardley United States
Michele Maggiore Switzerland
Patricio S. Letelier Brazil
V. de Sabbata Italy
B. F. Whiting United States
David Lovelock relative to H. A. Buchdahl Australia H. A. Buchdahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
H. A. Buchdahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lovelock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lovelock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lovelock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lovelock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lovelock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lovelock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lovelock. The network helps show where David Lovelock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Lovelock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Lovelock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Lovelock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Lovelock. David Lovelock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 14
4 72
5 9
6
Exploring differential equations via graphics and data
4
7 3
8 8
9
Tensors, differential forms, and variational principles
312
10 13
11 4
12 8
13
Variational Principles in the General Theory of Relativity.
5
14
Scalar--tensor field theories
4
15 39
16 6
17 99
18 1
19 15
20 2

About David Lovelock

David Lovelock is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography, having authored 41 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.5k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (883 citations). David Lovelock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hanno Rund, Yasuo Yoneyama, K.B. Fanibunda, Toshio Hosoi, Ian Anderson, D. O. Lomen, Gregory W. Horndeski, Hyejoo Kang, Ellen Yorke and I Ali. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Medical Physics and Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026