David Lipset

1.1k citations
60 papers · 562 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Lipset

51 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

David Lipset
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Anthropology 192
  • Geography, Planning and Development 105
  • Archeology 14
  • Demography 152
  • General Psychology 12
Replace Robert Borofsky with:
Robert Borofsky United States
Andrew Shryock United States
Roy Wagner Australia
Irving Hexham Canada
Stephen A. Tyler United States
Stephan Feuchtwang United Kingdom
T. M. S. Evens United States
James A. Boon United States
Bain Attwood Australia
P. Steven Sangren United States
David Lipset relative to Robert Borofsky United States Robert Borofsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Borofsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lipset

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lipset's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lipset with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lipset more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lipset

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lipset. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lipset. The network helps show where David Lipset may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Lipset, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Lipset Line = papers co-authored together David Lipset links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198192
2 199636
3 198634
4 201133
5 199733
6 201329
7 200423
8 201323
9 199922
10 198621
11 199720
12 200417
13
Seafaring Sepiks: Ecology, Warfare and Prestige in Murik Trade
198517
14 200912
15 199412
16 201412
17 20059
18 20038
19
Vehicles: Cars, canoes, and other metaphors of moral imagination
20147
20 19976

About David Lipset

David Lipset is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Geography, Planning and Development and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 60 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (18 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (17 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (6 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (192 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (105 citations), Archeology (14 citations), Demography (152 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). David Lipset has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adam Kuper, Robert J. Foster, Michael E. Meeker, Paul Roscoe, Richard Handler, Eric Kline Silverman, Lamont Lindstrom, Frank Schipper, Harry Oosterhuis and Katherine Roeder. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Anthropological Quarterly, Oceania and Journal de la Société des océanistes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact