David Layfield
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 5
- Surgery 5
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 3
- Co-authors
- Amit Agrawal (2 shared papers)H. Roché (1 shared paper)Christian H. Ottensmeier (4 shared papers)R. Rand Allingham (2 shared papers)Yutao Liu (2 shared papers)Andrew Dellinger (2 shared papers)Michael A. Hauser (2 shared papers)W. Daniel Stamer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BJS Open (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (1 paper)The Breast (1 paper)British journal of surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Layfield
15 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Ophthalmology 61
- Cancer Research 95
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 65
- Immunology 70
- Oncology 79
Countries citing papers authored by David Layfield
This map shows the geographic impact of David Layfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Layfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Layfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Layfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Layfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Layfield. The network helps show where David Layfield may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Layfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 8 | Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in normal human trabecular meshwork. | 2011 | 16 |
| 9 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | Is axillary dissection mandatory following a positive sentinel node biopsy? | 2010 | 1 |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | SAGE Expression Analysis of Trabecular Meshwork to Identify POAG Susceptibility Genes | 2005 | 1 |
| 16 | 2011 | 0 |
About David Layfield
David Layfield is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (61 citations), Cancer Research (95 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (65 citations), Immunology (70 citations) and Oncology (79 citations). David Layfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Amit Agrawal, H. Roché, Christian H. Ottensmeier, R. Rand Allingham, Yutao Liu, Andrew Dellinger, Michael A. Hauser, W. Daniel Stamer, Jason Gibson and Joshua Wheeler. Their work appears in journals such as BJS Open, Scientific Reports, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, The Breast and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.