David Laycock

495 citations
14 papers · 203 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

David Laycock

12 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers

David Laycock
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Political Science and International Relations 129
  • Public Administration 16
  • Communication 24
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
  • Gender Studies 22
Replace John Gaffney with:
John Gaffney United Kingdom
Kuan Hsin‐chi Hong Kong
Staf Hellemans Netherlands
Adrian Blau United Kingdom
André-Paul Frognier Belgium
Dieter Fuchs Germany
Pontus Odmalm United Kingdom
Chagai Weiss United States
Sorina Cristina Soare Italy
Stefan Immerfall Germany
David Laycock relative to John Gaffney United Kingdom John Gaffney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
John Gaffney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Laycock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Laycock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Laycock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Laycock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Laycock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Laycock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Laycock. The network helps show where David Laycock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside David Laycock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Laycock Line = papers co-authored together David Laycock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 20158
2 200935
3 200911
4 20058
5 20027
6
The New Right and Democracy in Canada: Understanding Reform and the Canadian Alliance
200138
7 199926
8
The puzzles of power : an introduction to political science
19980
9 199740
10
Policy studies in Canada
19961
11 19955
12 199418
13 19894
14 19882

About David Laycock

David Laycock is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Communication, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Populism, Right-Wing Movements (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Political Systems and Governance (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (129 citations), Public Administration (16 citations), Communication (24 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations) and Gender Studies (22 citations). David Laycock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marian Sawer, Darin Barney, Peter W.B. Phillips, Michael Howlett, Laurent Dobuzinskis, Steven Weldon, Lynda Erickson, P.J. Tallerico, Grace Skogstad and D. Rees. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Public Policy, Party Politics, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Policy and Society and Commonwealth and Comparative Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026