This map shows the geographic impact of John Gaffney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gaffney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gaffney more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gaffney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gaffney. The network helps show where John Gaffney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Gaffney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Gaffney.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Gaffney based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Gaffney. John Gaffney is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gaffney, John. (2013). Should Investment Treaty Tribunals Be Permitted to Request Preliminary Rulings From the Court of Justice of the European Union. TDM. 10(2).1 indexed citations
Gaffney, John. (1999). Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System. American University international law review. 14(4). 6.8 indexed citations
Gaffney, John. (1987). Interpretations of violence : the Handsworth riots of 1985. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.