David L. Still

604 total citations
19 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

David L. Still is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, David L. Still has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in David L. Still's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). David L. Still is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). David L. Still collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. David L. Still's co-authors include Arthur Bradley, Larry N. Thibos, Peter A. Howarth, Xilin Zhang, Leonard A. Temme, Joseph Bleiberg, Thomas C. Eskridge, Dennis Reeves, Robert R. Hoffman and Michael Mittelman and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Optometry and Vision Science.

In The Last Decade

David L. Still

17 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David L. Still United States	7	250	215	166	114	43	19	449
Jeffery K. Hovis Canada	14	142 0.6×	270 1.3×	147 0.9×	85 0.7×	52 1.2×	76	599
Oren Yehezkel Israel	16	328 1.3×	425 2.0×	186 1.1×	159 1.4×	45 1.0×	49	657
Robert A. Crone Netherlands	14	109 0.4×	200 0.9×	161 1.0×	49 0.4×	61 1.4×	33	523
Masakazu Hirota Japan	12	154 0.6×	80 0.4×	160 1.0×	161 1.4×	66 1.5×	43	589
John Siderov United Kingdom	15	330 1.3×	363 1.7×	220 1.3×	144 1.3×	48 1.1×	46	632
Dennis W. Siemsen United States	7	295 1.2×	394 1.8×	218 1.3×	144 1.3×	66 1.5×	11	725
Sarah Brill United States	9	264 1.1×	334 1.6×	96 0.6×	96 0.8×	38 0.9×	11	507
Gunilla Derefeldt Sweden	10	130 0.5×	268 1.2×	101 0.6×	54 0.5×	34 0.8×	26	445
Bernhard Lachenmayr Germany	13	112 0.4×	188 0.9×	308 1.9×	167 1.5×	90 2.1×	56	554
Evanne J. Casson Canada	11	107 0.4×	202 0.9×	149 0.9×	93 0.8×	40 0.9×	21	416

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Still

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Still's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Still with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Still more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Still

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Still. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Still. The network helps show where David L. Still may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David L. Still

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David L. Still. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David L. Still based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David L. Still. David L. Still is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Temme, Leonard A., et al.. (2017). A Novel, Inexpensive Method to Monitor, Record, and Analyze Breathing Behavior During Normobaric Hypoxia Generated by the Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device. Military Medicine. 182(S1). 210–215. 2 indexed citations

Eskridge, Thomas C., David L. Still, & Robert R. Hoffman. (2014). Principles for Human-Centered Interaction Design, Part 1: Performative Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 29(4). 88–94. 6 indexed citations

Temme, Leonard A., et al.. (2013). Uncovering Latent Deficits Due to Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Using Normobaric Hypoxia Stress. Frontiers in Neurology. 4. 41–41. 10 indexed citations

Still, David L. & Leonard A. Temme. (2012). An Independent, Objective Calibration Check for the Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 83(9). 902–908. 3 indexed citations

Temme, Leonard A., Dennis Reeves, David L. Still, et al.. (2011). Normobaric Hypoxia as a Cognitive Stress Test for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Oculometrics, Pulse Oximetry, and the Self Report of Symptom Severity. 1 indexed citations

Temme, Leonard A., et al.. (2010). Hypoxia and Flight Performance of Military Instructor Pilots in a Flight Simulator. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 81(7). 654–659. 40 indexed citations

Temme, Leonard A. & David L. Still. (2007). Head position of helicopter pilots during slalom maneuvers.. PubMed. 78(1). 38–42. 3 indexed citations

Temme, Leonard A. & David L. Still. (2006). The Head Posture of Helicopter Pilots During Visual Flight: A New Hypothesis for the Head Tilt Associated With Banking Aircraft. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

Temme, Leonard A. & David L. Still. (2005). Correlations among the helicopter pilot's head azimuth, elevation, and tilt in visual flight and their implications for incorporating roll compensation in the HMD. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5800. 83–83.

10.

Temme, Leonard A., et al.. (2001). The performance of standard vertical S-1 flight maneuvers by student U.S. Naval helicopter pilots.. PubMed. 72(7). 606–16. 3 indexed citations

11.

Thibos, Larry N., David L. Still, & Arthur Bradley. (1996). Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision. Vision Research. 36(2). 249–258. 113 indexed citations

12.

Still, David L., et al.. (1993). Contact lenses in aviation: the Marine Corps experience.. PubMed. 64(6). 538–40. 2 indexed citations

13.

Still, David L. & Leonard A. Temme. (1992). Eyeglass use by U.S. Navy jet pilots: effects on night carrier landing performance.. PubMed. 63(4). 273–5. 1 indexed citations

14.

Temme, Leonard A., David L. Still, & Michael Mittelman. (1992). Air-to-air target detection.. PubMed. 63(8). 739–40. 1 indexed citations

15.

Thibos, Larry N., Arthur Bradley, & David L. Still. (1991). Interferometric measurement of visual acuity and the effect of ocular chromatic aberration. Applied Optics. 30(16). 2079–2079. 13 indexed citations

16.

Bradley, Arthur, Larry N. Thibos, & David L. Still. (1990). Visual Acuity Measured with Clinical Maxwellian-View Systems: Effects of Beam Entry Location. Optometry and Vision Science. 67(11). 811–817. 15 indexed citations

17.

Thibos, Larry N., Arthur Bradley, David L. Still, Xilin Zhang, & Peter A. Howarth. (1990). Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration. Vision Research. 30(1). 33–49. 195 indexed citations

18.

Howarth, Peter A., et al.. (1988). Does the chromatic aberration of the eye vary with age?. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5(12). 2087–2087. 40 indexed citations

19.

Still, David L. & Larry N. Thibos. (1987). Detection of peripheral aliasing for gratings seen in the Newtonian view. Annual Meeting Optical Society of America. WT2–WT2. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact