Mitchell W. Dul

565 total citations
30 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Mitchell W. Dul is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Mitchell W. Dul has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Ophthalmology, 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Mitchell W. Dul's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (19 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers). Mitchell W. Dul is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (19 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers). Mitchell W. Dul collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Iran. Mitchell W. Dul's co-authors include William H. Swanson, Harry J. Wyatt, Hao Sun, Douglas G. Horner, José‐Manuel Alonso, Jianzhong Jin, Victor E. Malinovsky, Fei Pan, Qasim Zaidi and Reece Mazade and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Vision Research and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Mitchell W. Dul

28 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mitchell W. Dul United States 13 331 231 182 118 81 30 449
Faran Sabeti Australia 13 305 0.9× 197 0.9× 90 0.5× 60 0.5× 80 1.0× 41 399
Itay Ben-Zion Israel 12 226 0.7× 179 0.8× 101 0.6× 59 0.5× 38 0.5× 27 428
Andrew Whatham Switzerland 12 336 1.0× 326 1.4× 124 0.7× 243 2.1× 87 1.1× 22 546
Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam Iran 8 328 1.0× 316 1.4× 81 0.4× 329 2.8× 108 1.3× 15 521
Mario Zulauf Switzerland 14 405 1.2× 237 1.0× 100 0.5× 107 0.9× 41 0.5× 32 508
Alec M. Ansons United Kingdom 8 240 0.7× 134 0.6× 80 0.4× 85 0.7× 67 0.8× 17 342
Takahiro Niida Japan 9 200 0.6× 135 0.6× 117 0.6× 202 1.7× 14 0.2× 33 322
Nicholas A. Sala United States 6 408 1.2× 188 0.8× 311 1.7× 531 4.5× 58 0.7× 10 665
Florence Rigaudière France 11 243 0.7× 164 0.7× 106 0.6× 126 1.1× 181 2.2× 38 471
Evanne J. Casson Canada 11 149 0.5× 93 0.4× 202 1.1× 107 0.9× 40 0.5× 21 416

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell W. Dul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell W. Dul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell W. Dul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell W. Dul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell W. Dul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell W. Dul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell W. Dul. The network helps show where Mitchell W. Dul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell W. Dul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell W. Dul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell W. Dul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell W. Dul. Mitchell W. Dul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mazade, Reece, et al.. (2025). Optical defocus affects differently ON and OFF visual pathways. iScience. 28(6). 112500–112500.
2.
Jin, Jianzhong, et al.. (2023). Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia. Journal of Neuroscience. 44(3). e1487232023–e1487232023. 21 indexed citations
3.
Jia, Tan, et al.. (2022). Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance between ON and OFF Pathways in Human Vision. Journal of Neuroscience. 43(6). 993–1007. 11 indexed citations
4.
Dul, Mitchell W., et al.. (2020). Increment/Decrement Perimetry in Glaucomatous Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 3882–3882. 3 indexed citations
5.
Jin, Jianzhong, et al.. (2019). Amblyopia Affects the ON Visual Pathway More than the OFF. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(32). 6276–6290. 20 indexed citations
6.
Dul, Mitchell W., et al.. (2018). The development of a reference database with one-micron wavelength swept-source OCT DRI OCT Triton. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 1523–1523. 1 indexed citations
7.
Viswanáthan, Suresh, et al.. (2016). Pupillary response to blue light correlates with severity of glaucomatous neural damage. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 388–388. 4 indexed citations
8.
Swanson, William H., Mitchell W. Dul, Douglas G. Horner, & Victor E. Malinovsky. (2016). Contrast sensitivity perimetry data from adults free of eye disease. Data in Brief. 8. 654–658. 1 indexed citations
9.
Swanson, William H., Mitchell W. Dul, Douglas G. Horner, & Victor E. Malinovsky. (2016). Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field. Vision Research. 141. 23–29. 9 indexed citations
10.
Swanson, William H., et al.. (2014). Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry and Clinical Measures of Glaucomatous Damage. Optometry and Vision Science. 91(11). 1302–1311. 28 indexed citations
11.
Swanson, William H., Douglas G. Horner, Mitchell W. Dul, & Victor E. Malinovsky. (2014). Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 3(5). 6–6. 20 indexed citations
12.
Horner, Douglas G., et al.. (2013). Blur-Resistant Perimetric Stimuli. Optometry and Vision Science. 90(5). 466–474. 12 indexed citations
13.
Swanson, William H., et al.. (2010). Structure and Function in Patients with Glaucomatous Defects Near Fixation. Optometry and Vision Science. 88(1). 130–139. 18 indexed citations
14.
Chen, Yanjun, Harry J. Wyatt, William H. Swanson, & Mitchell W. Dul. (2008). Rapid Pupil-Based Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage. Optometry and Vision Science. 85(6). 471–481. 15 indexed citations
15.
Sun, Hao, et al.. (2008). Assessment of contrast gain signature in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with glaucoma. Vision Research. 48(26). 2633–2641. 43 indexed citations
16.
Wyatt, Harry J., Mitchell W. Dul, & William H. Swanson. (2007). Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity. Vision Research. 47(7). 925–936. 58 indexed citations
17.
Pan, Fei, William H. Swanson, & Mitchell W. Dul. (2006). Evaluation of a Two-Stage Neural Model of Glaucomatous Defect: An Approach to Reduce Test–Retest Variability. Optometry and Vision Science. 83(7). 499–511. 26 indexed citations
18.
Swanson, William H., et al.. (2004). Quantifying Effects of Retinal Illuminance on Frequency Doubling Perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(1). 235–235. 14 indexed citations
19.
Swanson, William H., et al.. (2002). REFINING THE USE OF FDT PERIMETRY IN MASS SCREENINGS.. Optometry and Vision Science. 79(Supplement). 13–13. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dul, Mitchell W., et al.. (1994). Bone Scintigraphy: A Review of the Procedure and Its Applications. Optometry and Vision Science. 71(8). 502–507. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Faran Sabeti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Itay Ben-Zion Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Whatham Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mario Zulauf Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alec M. Ansons Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Takahiro Niida Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicholas A. Sala Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Florence Rigaudière Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Evanne J. Casson
Rankless by CCL
2026