David L. Rennie

7.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
57 papers, 5.0k citations indexed

About

David L. Rennie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, David L. Rennie has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 5.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Clinical Psychology, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in David L. Rennie's work include Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (27 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (20 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (10 papers). David L. Rennie is often cited by papers focused on Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (27 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (20 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (10 papers). David L. Rennie collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. David L. Rennie's co-authors include Constance T. Fischer, Robert Elliott, Shaké G. Toukmanian, Lynne Angus, Jeanne C. Watson, Jörg Frommer, Karen Fergus, Sarah Hales, Rinat Nissim and Gary Rodin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Psychological Methods.

In The Last Decade

David L. Rennie

56 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Evolving guidelines for p... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1999 1998 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David L. Rennie Canada 27 2.5k 1.5k 1.0k 704 650 57 5.0k
Terri Gullickson 26 1.7k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 843 0.8× 532 0.8× 688 1.1× 149 4.5k
Susan D. Phillips United States 36 2.6k 1.0× 882 0.6× 1.1k 1.1× 1.3k 1.8× 834 1.3× 126 5.1k
Sarah Knox United States 29 2.4k 1.0× 2.2k 1.4× 817 0.8× 737 1.0× 590 0.9× 79 4.6k
Douglas H. Sprenkle United States 37 4.1k 1.7× 3.0k 1.9× 1.3k 1.3× 537 0.8× 491 0.8× 120 5.9k
Robert E. Larzelere United States 32 2.2k 0.9× 940 0.6× 1.1k 1.1× 483 0.7× 705 1.1× 95 4.1k
Amedeo Giorgi United States 24 1.7k 0.7× 1.4k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 1.1k 1.5× 961 1.5× 78 6.3k
Carla Willig United Kingdom 24 1.5k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 1.6k 1.6× 1.0k 1.4× 747 1.1× 60 5.3k
Chris Barker United Kingdom 39 1.7k 0.7× 1.4k 0.9× 1.7k 1.7× 905 1.3× 472 0.7× 101 5.7k
Heidi M. Levitt United States 40 2.5k 1.0× 2.4k 1.6× 1.3k 1.3× 752 1.1× 520 0.8× 139 5.9k
Susan Moore Australia 39 1.9k 0.8× 880 0.6× 1.2k 1.2× 1.2k 1.7× 351 0.5× 179 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Rennie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Rennie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Rennie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Rennie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Rennie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Rennie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Rennie. The network helps show where David L. Rennie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David L. Rennie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David L. Rennie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David L. Rennie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David L. Rennie. David L. Rennie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nissim, Rinat, David L. Rennie, Stephen Fleming, et al.. (2012). Goals Set in the Land of the Living/Dying: A Longitudinal Study of Patients Living with Advanced Cancer. Death Studies. 36(4). 360–390. 36 indexed citations
2.
Rennie, David L.. (2009). Logic, Hermeneutics, or Both?. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy. 5(3). 126–135. 2 indexed citations
3.
Frommer, Jörg & David L. Rennie. (2006). Qualitative psychotherapy research : methods and methodology. 58 indexed citations
4.
Rennie, David L. & Karen Fergus. (2006). Embodied Categorizing in the Grounded Theory Method. Theory & Psychology. 16(4). 483–503. 69 indexed citations
5.
Frommer, Jörg & David L. Rennie. (2006). Methodologie, Methodik und Qualität qualitativer Forschung. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 56(5). 210–217. 11 indexed citations
6.
Rennie, David L.. (2001). Grounded Theory Methodology as Methodical Hermeneutics: Reconciling Realism and Relativism. 43(3). 32. 7 indexed citations
7.
Rennie, David L.. (2001). How Clients Make Psychotherapy Work. Psychotherapy Research. 11(1). 123–124. 1 indexed citations
8.
Elliott, Robert, Constance T. Fischer, & David L. Rennie. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38(3). 215–229. 1628 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Rennie, David L.. (1996). Commentary on “Clients' Perceptions of Treatment for Depression: I and II”. Psychotherapy Research. 6(4). 263–268. 4 indexed citations
10.
Rennie, David L.. (1994). Clients' Accounts of Resistance in Counselling: A Qualitative Analysis. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 28(1). 43–57. 38 indexed citations
11.
Watson, Jeanne C. & David L. Rennie. (1994). Qualitative analysis of clients' subjective experience of significant moments during the exploration of problematic reactions.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 41(4). 500–509. 79 indexed citations
12.
Rennie, David L.. (1994). Storytelling in psychotherapy: The client's subjective experience.. Psychotherapy. 31(2). 234–243. 97 indexed citations
13.
Toukmanian, Shaké G. & David L. Rennie. (1992). Psychotherapy process research : paradigmatic and narrative approaches. SAGE Publications eBooks. 198 indexed citations
14.
Rennie, David L., et al.. (1983). Effects of trainee expectancies and specific instructions on counselling skill acquisition.. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 15(2). 174–185. 4 indexed citations
15.
Rennie, David L., et al.. (1980). A comparative analysis of verbal helping responses of counselors, nurses, salespersons, and teachers. American Journal of Community Psychology. 8(5). 617–620. 4 indexed citations
16.
Toukmanian, Shaké G., et al.. (1978). Counsellor Trainee Awareness of Evaluative Criteria: A Neglected Variable. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 12(3). 7 indexed citations
17.
Rennie, David L., et al.. (1978). Counsellor Communication Style as a Determinant of Rater-Perceived Empathy. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 12(4). 8 indexed citations
18.
Toukmanian, Shaké G. & David L. Rennie. (1975). Microcounseling versus human relations training: Relative effectiveness with undergraduate trainees.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 22(4). 345–352. 46 indexed citations
19.
Thelen, Mark H., et al.. (1972). EXPECTANCY TO PERFORM AND VICARIOUS REWARD: THEIR EFFECTS UPON IMITATION. Child Development. 43(2). 699–703. 5 indexed citations
20.
Thelen, Mark H., et al.. (1972). Expectancy to Perform and Vicarious Reward: Their Effects upon Imitation. Child Development. 43(2). 699–699. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026