David Jacques

1.1k citations
59 papers · 712 indexed · h-index 14

David Jacques

49 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

David Jacques
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Neurology 305
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 175
  • Museology 22
  • Space and Planetary Science 8
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 112
Replace Stephen Oppenheimer with:
Stephen Oppenheimer United States
Dora Angelicheva Australia
Russell L. McLaughlin Ireland
Alan Johnston United Kingdom
Ruth Kark Israel
M. Geppert Germany
Lars Larsson Denmark
Manuela Lima Portugal
Svetlana Lublinsky Israel
P. Lamberti Italy
David Jacques relative to Stephen Oppenheimer United States Stephen Oppenheimer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Stephen Oppenheimer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Jacques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Jacques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Jacques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Jacques more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Jacques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Jacques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Jacques. The network helps show where David Jacques may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Jacques, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Jacques Line = papers co-authored together David Jacques links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20231
3 20230
4 202211
5 20100
6 20102
7 20091
8 20045
9 20035
10 20017
11 199916
12 199870
13 19986
14
Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine serum concentrations and clinical response in weekly versus daily dosing.
199624
15 199536
16 19955
17 199413
18 199386
19 19921
20 19892

About David Jacques

David Jacques is a scholar working on Neurology, Archeology, Anthropology, Museology and Paleontology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (14 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (3 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (3 papers) and Landscape and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (305 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (175 citations), Museology (22 citations), Space and Planetary Science (8 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (112 citations). David Jacques has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Oleg V. Kopyov, Brian Copcutt, Robert W. Rand, M.E. Olds, Rex Moats, David J. Dubowitz, Brian D. Ross, Stefan Blüml, Christopher Duma and Mark Randolph. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology and Neuropediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026