David J. Tate
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Oncology top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael V. MiceliD A NewsomeDavid A. NewsomeMichael J. BourkeLobke DesomerMayenaaz SidhuPeter OliverSuzanne L. Wolden
- Topics
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (55 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (32 papers)Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (21 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
David J. Tate
108 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
- Oncology 1.0k
- Surgery 656
- Molecular Biology 559
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 298
Countries citing papers authored by David J. Tate
This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Tate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Tate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Tate. The network helps show where David J. Tate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Tate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Tate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Tate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Tate. David J. Tate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 186 |
About David J. Tate
David J. Tate is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (55 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (32 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (231 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (164 citations). David J. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michael V. Miceli, D A Newsome, David A. Newsome, Michael J. Bourke, Lobke Desomer, Mayenaaz Sidhu, Peter Oliver, Suzanne L. Wolden, Stephen J. Williams and Sarah S. Donaldson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.