David J. Quiram

464 total citations
8 papers, 341 citations indexed

About

David J. Quiram is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Quiram has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 341 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 5 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 1 paper in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in David J. Quiram's work include Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers) and Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (2 papers). David J. Quiram is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers) and Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (2 papers). David J. Quiram collaborates with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. David J. Quiram's co-authors include Patrick L. Mills, J. Ryley, Klavs F. Jensen, Martin A. Schmidt, I‐Ming Hsing, Norman Yeh, Scott Reynolds, Suhas Shelukar, Jennifer E. Ho and Aleksander J. Franz and has published in prestigious journals such as Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Chemical Engineering Science and Powder Technology.

In The Last Decade

David J. Quiram

8 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David J. Quiram United States 7 190 96 77 68 61 8 341
Midong Shi China 12 149 0.8× 118 1.2× 146 1.9× 111 1.6× 61 1.0× 27 481
Matthew W. Losey United States 5 502 2.6× 147 1.5× 123 1.6× 150 2.2× 121 2.0× 5 658
Chiaki Kuroda Japan 11 143 0.8× 150 1.6× 56 0.7× 60 0.9× 31 0.5× 66 393
Mahdi Ramezani United States 13 216 1.1× 114 1.2× 75 1.0× 94 1.4× 68 1.1× 22 407
Otto Wörz Germany 8 314 1.7× 87 0.9× 41 0.5× 99 1.5× 61 1.0× 11 421
Safa Kutup Kurt Germany 10 496 2.6× 107 1.1× 108 1.4× 119 1.8× 123 2.0× 14 601
K. Sujatha India 14 134 0.7× 36 0.4× 116 1.5× 30 0.4× 101 1.7× 34 393
Michael Patrascu Israel 11 146 0.8× 138 1.4× 28 0.4× 59 0.9× 96 1.6× 17 355
Meguru Kaminoyama Japan 13 298 1.6× 35 0.4× 106 1.4× 64 0.9× 145 2.4× 79 521
Franz Trachsel Switzerland 6 743 3.9× 115 1.2× 191 2.5× 166 2.4× 170 2.8× 6 822

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Quiram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Quiram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Quiram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Quiram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Quiram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Quiram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Quiram. The network helps show where David J. Quiram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Quiram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Quiram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Quiram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Quiram. David J. Quiram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Quiram, David J., Klavs F. Jensen, Martin A. Schmidt, et al.. (2007). Integrated Microreactor System for Gas-Phase Catalytic Reactions. 3. Microreactor System Design and System Automation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 46(25). 8319–8335. 8 indexed citations
2.
Quiram, David J., Klavs F. Jensen, Martin A. Schmidt, et al.. (2007). Integrated Microreactor System for Gas-Phase Catalytic Reactions. 2. Microreactor Packaging and Testing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 46(25). 8306–8318. 5 indexed citations
3.
Quiram, David J., Klavs F. Jensen, Martin A. Schmidt, et al.. (2007). Integrated Microreactor System for Gas-Phase Catalytic Reactions. 1. Scale-up Microreactor Design and Fabrication. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 46(25). 8292–8305. 10 indexed citations
4.
Mills, Patrick L., David J. Quiram, & J. Ryley. (2007). Microreactor technology and process miniaturization for catalytic reactions—A perspective on recent developments and emerging technologies. Chemical Engineering Science. 62(24). 6992–7010. 183 indexed citations
5.
Shelukar, Suhas, et al.. (2000). Identification and characterization of factors controlling tablet coating uniformity in a Wurster coating process. Powder Technology. 110(1-2). 29–36. 72 indexed citations
6.
Quiram, David J., I‐Ming Hsing, Aleksander J. Franz, Klavs F. Jensen, & Martin A. Schmidt. (2000). Design issues for membrane-based, gas phase microchemical systems. Chemical Engineering Science. 55(16). 3065–3075. 42 indexed citations
7.
Quiram, David J., et al.. (1998). Characterization of Microchemical Systems Using Simulations. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 6 indexed citations
8.
Quiram, David J., et al.. (1994). The solubility of solids in compressed gases. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 7(3). 159–164. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026