David Hume

1.6k total citations
17 papers, 143 citations indexed

About

David Hume is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Hume has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 143 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Geometry and Topology, 5 papers in Mathematical Physics and 3 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in David Hume's work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers). David Hume is often cited by papers focused on Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers). David Hume collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. David Hume's co-authors include M. R. Mickey, P. I. Terasaki, Donna L. Vredevoe, Theodor Lipps, R. Brandt, Pierre‐Emmanuel Caprace, Denis Osin, Richard J. Cleveland, Alessandro Sisto and Peter W. Kopf and has published in prestigious journals such as Transplantation, Population and Development Review and Immunology.

In The Last Decade

David Hume

13 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers

David Hume
Alex Murray United Kingdom
A. R. Myers United States
S. J. Connolly United Kingdom
J. Samuel Walker United States
Gordon Griffiths United States
John B. Freed United States
Benjamin Arbel Israel
Robert Morgan United Kingdom
Samuel Rawson Gardiner Australia
Frank Barlow United Kingdom
Alex Murray United Kingdom
David Hume
Citations per year, relative to David Hume David Hume (= 1×) peers Alex Murray

Countries citing papers authored by David Hume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hume. The network helps show where David Hume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Hume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Hume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Hume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Hume. David Hume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Hume, David, et al.. (2022). Poincaré profiles of Lie groups and a coarse geometric dichotomy. Geometric and Functional Analysis. 32(5). 1063–1133. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hume, David, et al.. (2018). Extending group actions on metric spaces. Journal of Topology and Analysis. 12(3). 625–665. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hume, David, et al.. (2017). Stability and the Morse boundary. Journal of the London Mathematical Society. 95(3). 963–988. 11 indexed citations
4.
Hume, David. (2017). Embedding mapping class groups into a finite product of trees. Groups Geometry and Dynamics. 11(2). 613–647. 4 indexed citations
5.
Caprace, Pierre‐Emmanuel & David Hume. (2015). Orthogonal forms of Kac–Moody groups are acylindrically hyperbolic. Annales de l’institut Fourier. 65(6). 2613–2640. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hume, David & Alessandro Sisto. (2013). Embedding universal covers of graph manifolds in products of trees. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 141(10). 3337–3340. 2 indexed citations
7.
Hume, David. (2013). Direct embeddings of relatively hyperbolic groups with optimal ℓ p compression exponent. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal). 2015(703). 147–172. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hume, David, et al.. (2011). Bribery and corruption: Key issues for Australian companies operating overseas. University of New South Wales law journal. 34(3). 747.
9.
Hume, David. (2005). Mobility, Creativity, and Technological Development:. Immunology. 2 indexed citations
10.
Hume, David, et al.. (2001). On the Cardinalities of Row Spaces of Boolean Matrices. Semigroup Forum. 62(2). 331–332. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hume, David, et al.. (1997). Properties of a standard form for a Boolean matrix. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 254(1-3). 49–65. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hume, David. (1994). Political Essays. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 67 indexed citations
13.
Kopf, Peter W. & David Hume. (1987). David Hume Philosoph Und Wirtschaftstheoretiker.
14.
Hume, David. (1977). On the Populousness of Ancient Nations. Population and Development Review. 3(3). 323–323. 5 indexed citations
15.
Hume, David, Theodor Lipps, & R. Brandt. (1973). Ein Traktat über die menschliche Natur (Buch I-III). 11 indexed citations
16.
Hume, David, et al.. (1967). SEROTYPING FOR HOMOTRANSPLANTATION. IX. EVALUATION OF LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN MATCHING WITH THE CLINICAL COURSE AND REJECTION TYPES. Transplantation. 5(Supplement). 1040–1045. 29 indexed citations
17.
Cleveland, Richard J., et al.. (1964). SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPHOCYTURIA IN RENAL HOMOGRAFT REJECTION.. PubMed. 15. 168–70. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alex Murray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. R. Myers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. J. Connolly Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Samuel Walker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gordon Griffiths Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John B. Freed Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin Arbel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Morgan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samuel Rawson Gardiner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frank Barlow
Rankless by CCL
2026