David Hume
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Mathematical Physics
- Co-authors
- M. R. MickeyP. I. TerasakiDonna L. VredevoeTheodor LippsR. BrandtPierre‐Emmanuel CapraceDenis OsinRichard J. Cleveland
- Topics
- Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers)Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers)Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
David Hume
13 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Political Science and International Relations 38
- Sociology and Political Science 29
- Economics and Econometrics 24
- Geometry and Topology 23
- Mathematical Physics 22
Countries citing papers authored by David Hume
This map shows the geographic impact of David Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hume more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Hume
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hume. The network helps show where David Hume may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Hume
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Hume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Hume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Hume. David Hume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Bribery and corruption: Key issues for Australian companies operating overseas | 0 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 67 | |
| 13 | David Hume Philosoph Und Wirtschaftstheoretiker | 0 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Ein Traktat über die menschliche Natur (Buch I-III) | 11 |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPHOCYTURIA IN RENAL HOMOGRAFT REJECTION. | 2 |
About David Hume
David Hume is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Transplantation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (21 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (11 citations) and Geometry and Topology (23 citations). David Hume has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include M. R. Mickey, P. I. Terasaki, Donna L. Vredevoe, Theodor Lipps, R. Brandt, Pierre‐Emmanuel Caprace, Denis Osin, Richard J. Cleveland, Alessandro Sisto and Peter W. Kopf. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Population and Development Review and Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.