David Hitchcock

1.9k total citations
58 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

David Hitchcock is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Hitchcock has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Philosophy, 14 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Hitchcock's work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers). David Hitchcock is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers). David Hitchcock collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. David Hitchcock's co-authors include Milos Jenicek, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, Bart Verheij, Alasdair Blair, Pat Croskerry, Karen J. Bakker, Joseph P. Pinto, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans and Jeremiah Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Economic Geography, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association and International Journal of Intelligent Systems.

In The Last Decade

David Hitchcock

50 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by David Hitchcock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hitchcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hitchcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hitchcock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hitchcock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hitchcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hitchcock. The network helps show where David Hitchcock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Hitchcock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Hitchcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Hitchcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Hitchcock. David Hitchcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Textbook Treatments of Fallacies 2023 ·Argumentation ·David Hitchcock	1
2	Definition: A practical guide to constructing and evaluating definitions of terms 2021 ·Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) ·David Hitchcock	4
3	Harald R. Wohlrapp: The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning 4 2015 ·Argumentation ·David Hitchcock	1
4	Appeals to Considerations 2013 ·Informal Logic ·David Hitchcock	8
5	Arguing as Trying to Show That a Target-claim is Correct 2011 ·THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science ·David Hitchcock	2
6	Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation 2010 ·Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) ·David Hitchcock, Bart Verheij	20
7	Obituary: Stephen Edelston Toulmin 2010 ·Argumentation ·David Hitchcock	0
8	Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Argumentation Library) 2007 ·Springer eBooks ·David Hitchcock, Bart Verheij	2
9	The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments 2005 ·Argumentation ·David Hitchcock, Bart Verheij	9
10	Russell and Critical Thinking 2002 ·Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies ·David Hitchcock	1
11	Environment and Business 2002 ·Economic Geography ·Karen J. Bakker, Alasdair Blair, David Hitchcock	11
12	A note on implicit premisses 2002 ·Informal Logic ·David Hitchcock	7
13	Sampling scholarly arguments: a test of a theory of good inference 2001 ·Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) ·David Hitchcock	11
14	Statement on Practical Reasoning 2000 ·David Hitchcock	2
15	Stanovich's Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning 2000 ·Informal Logic ·Ahti‐Veikko Pietarinen, David Hitchcock	0
16	Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle 2000 ·History and Philosophy of Logic ·David Hitchcock	3
17	The Thomas-Nolt Dispute: Some Lessons about Induction 1999 ·Informal Logic ·David Hitchcock	1
18	Holyoak and Thagard`s Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought 1996 ·Informal Logic ·David Hitchcock	1
19	Johnson`s The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics 1996 ·Informal Logic ·David Hitchcock	1
20	Informal Fallacies 1989 ·Teaching Philosophy ·David Hitchcock	0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact