David Giles

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

David Giles's Hit Papers

Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research 2002 · 738 citations
7380+8+16Years since publication200400600

Peers

David Giles
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Gender Studies 697
  • Literature and Literary Theory 823
  • Communication 470
  • Human-Computer Interaction 180
  • Marketing 271
Replace Cynthia A. Hoffner with:
Cynthia A. Hoffner United States
Hans Hoeken Netherlands
Adriana M. Manago United States
Dafna Lemish Israel
Jerold L. Hale United States
Dalmas A. Taylor United States
Donna Rouner United States
Andrew M. Ledbetter United States
Laura Stafford United States
Amy I. Nathanson United States
David Giles relative to Cynthia A. Hoffner United States Cynthia A. Hoffner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Cynthia A. Hoffner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Giles. The network helps show where David Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Giles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Giles Line = papers co-authored together David Giles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research
Hit paper breakdown →
2002738
2 2003210
3 2007150
4 2014143
5 2006121
6 2005117
7 201090
8 202190
9 200880
10 200851
11 200351
12 200947
13 200936
14 201335
15 201735
16 201332
17 201731
18 200830
19 201628
20 200628

About David Giles

David Giles is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media, Gender, and Advertising (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Digital Communication and Language (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (697 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (823 citations), Communication (470 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (180 citations) and Marketing (271 citations). David Giles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John Maltby, Rachel Shaw, Wyke Stommel, Trena M. Paulus, Darren Reed, Jessica Nina Lester, Louise Barber, Lynn E. McCutcheon, Sara Pabian and Liselot Hudders. Their work appears in journals such as Celebrity Studies, Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Health Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology and British Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact