Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A uniform strain hexahedron and quadrilateral with orthogonal hourglass control
Citations per year, relative to David Flanagan David Flanagan (= 1×)
peers
Douglas H. Norrie
Countries citing papers authored by David Flanagan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Flanagan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Flanagan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Flanagan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Flanagan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Flanagan. The network helps show where David Flanagan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Flanagan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Flanagan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Flanagan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Flanagan. David Flanagan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jensen, Robert E., et al.. (2017). Adhesives: Test Method, Group Assignment, and Categorization Guide for High-Loading Rate Applications - History and Rationale.2 indexed citations
3.
Flanagan, David. (2011). JavaScript: The Definitive Guide Activate Your Web Pages.19 indexed citations
Flanagan, David, et al.. (1999). Java enterprise in a nutshell: a desktop quick reference. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).3 indexed citations
11.
Flanagan, David. (1999). Java foundation classes in a nutshell : a desktop quick reference. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
Flanagan, David. (1997). Java in a nutshell (2nd ed.): a desktop quick reference.10 indexed citations
14.
Flanagan, David & Paula Ferguson. (1997). JAVA in a Nutshell - A Desktop Quick Reference. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).24 indexed citations
15.
Flanagan, David. (1997). Java Examples in a Nutshell. Medical Entomology and Zoology.13 indexed citations
Nichols, Kathleen, Daniel J. Dubois, John Flower, et al.. (1990). Performance tools. IEEE Software. 7(3). 21–30.15 indexed citations
18.
Crawford, Dawn M., et al.. (1988). Differential Scanning Calorimetry as a Method for Indicating Hydrolysis of Urethane Elastomers. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).2 indexed citations
19.
Flanagan, David & L.M. Taylor. (1987). Structuring data for concurrent vectorized processing in a transient dynamics finite element program. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.