David Favre
- Genetics
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Taylor YoungMichael R. MoyerPeter L. BorcheltAlan M. BeckJacques TessierNathalie ProvostGilliane ChadeufAnna Salvetti
- Topics
- Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEcological EconomicsThe Journal of Gene Medicine
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Favre
21 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Genetics 62
- Ecology 60
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 54
- Geography, Planning and Development 41
- Law 31
Countries citing papers authored by David Favre
This map shows the geographic impact of David Favre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Favre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Favre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Favre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Favre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Favre. The network helps show where David Favre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Favre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Favre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Favre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Favre. David Favre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Access to Veterinary Care: Barriers, Current Practices, and Public Policy | 27 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Animal Law: Welfare, Interests, and Rights | 5 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Integrating Animal Interests into Our Legal System | 4 |
| 10 | Judicial Recognition of the Interests of Animals - A New Tort | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | International Trade in Endangered Species:A Guide to CITES | 15 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About David Favre
David Favre is a scholar working on Law, Geography, Planning and Development and Small Animals, having authored 27 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (41 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (54 citations) and Law (31 citations). David Favre has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Taylor Young, Michael R. Moyer, Peter L. Borchelt, Alan M. Beck, Jacques Tessier, Nathalie Provost, Gilliane Chadeuf, Anna Salvetti, Pascale Nony and Jürgen A. Kleinschmidt. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecological Economics and The Journal of Gene Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.