David Ekström

12 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

David Ekström
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
Replace Mariaelena Bertani with:
Mariaelena Bertani Italy
Toshimasa Maruta Japan
Jay Kaplan United States
Leo F. Droppleman United States
Fujika Katsuki Japan
Philip Snaith United Kingdom
J R Davidson United States
Kimberly K. Laubmeier United States
Rudolf Gregurek Croatia
Ariel Frajerman France
David Ekström relative to Mariaelena Bertani Italy Mariaelena Bertani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Mariaelena Bertani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ekström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ekström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ekström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ekström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ekström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ekström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ekström. The network helps show where David Ekström may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ekström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ekström Line = papers co-authored together David Ekström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199655
2 199052
3 199246
4 199943
5 199642
6 199038
7 199033
8 199128
9 200215
10 19919
11 19905
12
The Reliability of Computer-Processed EEG in the Determination of ECT Seizure Duration.
19912

About David Ekström

David Ekström is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (20 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (75 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations). David Ekström has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert N. Golden, John J. Haggerty, Dwight L. Evans, Cort A. Pedersen, Greg Maislin, Cynthia J. Knauer, Wendy C. Budin, Deborah Witt Sherman, Marilyn Bookbinder and Terry M. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services, Academic Psychiatry and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact