David E. Timm

57 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

David E. Timm
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Clinical Biochemistry 180
  • Physiology 605
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Biochemistry 140
  • Pharmacology 308
Replace Ailing Fu with:
Ailing Fu China
William Leister United States
Oded Livnah Israel
Knut Teigen Norway
Jianguo Ji China
František Hubálek United States
Igor V. Kurnikov United States
Kengo Okada Japan
Annalisa Relini Italy
C.S. Raman United States
David E. Timm relative to Ailing Fu China Ailing Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Ailing Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Timm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Timm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Timm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Timm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Timm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Timm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Timm. The network helps show where David E. Timm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Timm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Timm Line = papers co-authored together David E. Timm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011329
2 1994225
3 2000186
4 2015172
5 2000135
6 1962116
7 1994107
8 200191
9 199875
10 200074
11 199972
12 198862
13 199358
14 199357
15 200155
16 200147
17 200546
18 201843
19 196241
20 199241

About David E. Timm

David E. Timm is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Biochemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (180 citations), Physiology (605 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Biochemistry (140 citations) and Pharmacology (308 citations). David E. Timm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Neet, Joel M. Harp, Gerard J. Bunick, B. Leif Hanson, Håkon Flood, Olof Theander, Heather A. Mueller, Lydia J. Baker, Miguel Angel Peñalva and Santiago Rodrı́guez de Córdoba. Their work appears in journals such as Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Protein Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact